|
No Lance, I wouldn't acknowledge this to be the case
because everything that is spoken on TT is not the
Word of God, and not everything I write is the
Word of God because that would have to include opinion at
times along with personal stories. So what is the
point you are trying to make here? Is it good to be calling one
another hypocrites and disrespecting the
Moderator? Where do you think this kind
of attitude leads??
When you describe that which you say as THE TRUTH
OF THE WORD OF GOD Judy, while that spoken by another as OTHER THAN the truth
of the word of god, Judy then, you are doing the very thing that you speak of
as 'both discouraging and wearying'. Would you not acknowledge this to be the
case?
We should make accusing each other
personally a matter to be discussed offline.
I find these constant accusations to be
both discouraging and wearying - are we interested in Truth or not?
Why give the enemy a platform to
tear each other down.
DAVEH: I don't think you understand the nature of my
posts, Perry. I'm not talking about your sexual
experiences. I'm talking about Christian
hypocrisy and the double standard as practiced on TT. Is the
double standard on TT not a fair topic? Why should I have to
discuss that matter offline? Is this not relevant to all
TTers, Perry?
I find it very telling that you
make false accusations against me.......
you suggest I might
have some knowledge of Izzy's sexual
experiences,
.........which I did not do. Go back and
read my exact words if you don't believe me. If you can't find them,
I'll gladly provide them and you can see for yourself that you are again
accusing me of something I did not do.
you suggest that saying
"one of Joseph Smiths spiritual wives" might have some sexual
connotation,
..........That has been suggested before on TT by
other TTers, and the moderator did nothing to discourage such
comments. Now you want to ban me from posting something other TTers
can post with no retribution. This is simply another example of a
double standard.
you try to spin Dean up by suggesting he gets
"excited" by sexual references.
.........I merely stated the
truth about Deans sensitivity to such things. This was not an
ad-hom attack. Is the truth now a problem on TT? People
have said a lot more vile things about me with no condemnation by the
moderator. Why the double standard now, Perry?
these
amount to false accusations,
DAVEH: How can
that possibly be a false accusation if it is true,
Perry? If anything, it is you who is making false
accusations about me in this matter. Once again....a TT
double standard.
the intentions of spinning Dean up on a
banned topic
DAVEH: You are absolutely wrong
again, Perry. You simply fail to understand the nature of my
posts. My intentions are not to spin up Dean at all. It is
you who I am trying to enlighten as to the Christian hypocrisy
involving the double standard practiced on TT with regard to
Mormons. Until you as the moderator recognize it, why should
I discontinue pointing it out every time it occurs? Is not the TT
double standard an acceptable discussion topic?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave, you suggest I might have some knowledge of Izzy's
sexual experiences, then you suggest that saying "one of Joseph
Smiths spiritual wives" might have some sexual connotation, then
you try to spin Dean up by suggesting he gets "excited" by
sexual references. These amount to false accusations,
with the intentions of spinning Dean up on a banned topic.
Any more posts from you containing sexual references and I will have to
take you off the forum until you agree not to do so. Take any issues you
have up with me, offline, at this address, not on the forum.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator comment **
Date: Tue, 13
Dec 2005 07:29:32 -0800
* Please try to /refrain /from
making sexual references, especially /false accuastions/.*
DAVEH: Let's see if I understand this,
Perry. Recently I asked some questions that were no more
sexually oriented than what you commonly make, Dean then claimed
foul......and you banned further discussion based on the /perception
/you and Dean had about what those comments might have implied.
Now you have made a comment that can be perceived
to be sexually charged..........
*If lucky, you may become one
of his many spirit wives! *
..........and you don't want to
recognize the double standard? It is interesting that when you
or other TTers make any kind of denigrating remarks toward LDS
theology with sexual implications, nothing is considered off
limits. When I point out this obvious double standard, I am
cautioned by the moderator to /refrain /from bringing the discussion
to the TT table under the guise of making/ false accusations/.
It must be convenient to have a moderator who can see non-LDS posters
through one non-judgmental eye, and perceive a completely different
perspective of LDS posters through the other, more critical eye.
I suppose if one has an ax to grind against LDS theology, and is not
embarrassed to publicly admit such....then it should not surprise
anybody to find that person practicing a double standard. The
curious part about this is that it happens on a forum called
/TruthTalk/, where /truth /is presupposed to be the dominating factor,
yet it seems to be suppressed when it comes to recognizing the
Christian hypocrisy found here.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
* Please try to /refrain
/from making sexual references, especially /false accuastions/.*
This is not the forum for that? I am sure there are many discussion
forums about sex if that type of discussion interests you.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Perry's Sexually Suggestive Comments
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:07:35 -0800
**If lucky, you
may become one of his many spirit wives! **
DAVEH: I wonder if Dean is going to rebuke you
for making such sexually suggestive comments, Perry!
If not, will we then have another example of hypocritical
Christianity in TT?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Just be sure you remember your
secret password and secret handshake so Joseph Smith will allow
you entrance into heaven. *If lucky, you may become one of his
many spirit wives! *
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Signing off...
Date: Mon, 12
Dec 2005 18:19:35 EST
I guess I never got to
know you, Christine--but hope to meet you in the
great
beyond--you may be required to testify at the Bar of God as to
what you
have seen and heard on TT--
Blainerb
In a message dated 12/11/2005 11:24:52 P.M. Mountain
Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I am signing off. I have gotten sucked
into the world of TT, and I think it
would be
beneficial to my GPA to bid adeiu. Thanks for all the
discussions. I
have learned a great deal. May the
Lord bless you and keep you all.
It would be
cool to meet you all in real life some day. But maybe not all
in
the same room. I wonder how that would turn
out... :-)
-Christine Miller
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
|
