On 15/11/09 23:32 +0100, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > II What we need for the doc handling in the project: > - There are number of small errors in the existing english documentation, > that should be cleaned up *before* translation. I don't know, which could > be the best way to achieve doc review, but personally I dislike to put > it all on Rietveld, because it is too much work for such small, but > multiple changes.
It depends of the change. If it is typo or better words, this doesn't need to be discussed and patch is enough. But if it needs discussion, Rietveld is the best. > Best for me would be some kind of doc team with direct > commit permissions to doc dirs, but I am aware, that modules normally are > in the responsibility of the module creator. So I don't know which way to go > here, but it is kind of pointless (at least for me) to translate docs with > errors. I don't like the creation of teams. Because it hides the responsability behind a group and things are not done. And any way, docs must be also reviewed like any other changes. -- Cédric Krier B2CK SPRL Rue de Rotterdam, 4 4000 Liège Belgium Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Email: [email protected] Jabber: [email protected] Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
pgpaCJGAcVBYs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
