On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Nicolas Évrard <[email protected]> wrote: > * Luis Falcon [2011-11-17 19:23 +0100]: >> >> I don't agree. I believe we need to have commitment in what we talk, >> suggest and write. A project must meet and deliver its goals. Then, of >> course, in rare circumstances, something might not be delivered on >> time, but that would be just an exception. > > We put goals in the roadmap because we think they are features/changes > needed by the project and because we think that we should put the > focus on those. Who is "we" ? > >> What we can't do is getting do meeting in Belgium, move people around >> from many countries around the world, agreed on the production module >> and now say "we'll see if it happens...." or "this is free software >> world and things might not happen". Is just not serious. > > That's not how I understood what happened at the TUL. > > The proposition on elveos date from September which means that the > design is already almost clear (at least in Cédric's mind), people at > the TUL recognized a need an decided to help by donating. Of course > those donations will speed up the development but if the amount is not > reached before the release I won't blame Cédric (or anybody else) for > working on some stuffs that he finds more interesting. On the other > hand is the amount is reached, then B2CK will have to create the > module : at that time there will be a contract between the > subscriptors and B2CK. I don't like this concept. You can do whatever you feel is more interesting, but then don't put other things on the list. > > And I am definitely serious when I say that. > >> Don't get me wrong. This is a great project and that's why a lot of us >> are here, contributing and supporting it, but we need to deliver the >> goals, otherwise it will become chaotic and unpredictable. > > It's not chaotic / unpredictable the way it is now. It's just that > stuffs will happen only if the community really want them. The community wants the production module, as well as a good home page. But I don't see it happening either. > There is no OpenERP SA to drive the developments here, you're not customers, > we're > not your supplier (unless you order us some stuffs like others already > did). I agree with that concept. We don't want to be customers and don't see B2CK as a supplier. If we're not customers and you're not suppliers, drop it with the Elveos portal. You contradict yourself.
> >> PS: Time to have the Tryton foundation. > > It don't think it would solve what you're thinking is the issue. > But this is not the issue of this thread, so we should discuss this in > the dedicated topic. It's quite hard to discuss, propose or do anything with your attitude. > > -- > Nicolas Évrard > > B2CK SPRL > rue de Rotterdam, 4 > 4000 Liège > Belgium > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > E-mail/Jabber: [email protected] > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ > > -- > [email protected] mailing list > -- [email protected] mailing list
