On 07.01.2016 12:53, Cédric Krier wrote: > On 2016-01-07 12:28, Mathias Behrle wrote: >> * Cédric Krier: " Re: [tryton] RFC: Invoice sequences" (Sat, 26 Dec 2015 >> 15:10:15 +0100): >> >>> On 2015-12-25 22:26, Jordi Esteve (Zikzakmedia) wrote: >>>> El 24/12/15 a les 15:06, Cédric Krier ha escrit: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Following the previous discussions about the invoice sequence and the >>>>> fiscal year, I have started a feature request to improve the situation >>>>> and manage more cases. >>>>> >>>>> https://bugs.tryton.org/issue5205 >>>>> >>>>> Please comment if the proposal could be in conflict with your local >>>>> usage. >>>> The new proposal (a check when setting the number on an invoice to ensure >>>> that the invoice date not before any invoice dates numbered with the same >>>> sequence) fits well the Spanish law and practice. >>>> >>>> In fact, the Spanish team maintains a module [1] that implements this idea >>>> with some restrictions because the sequence is not yet stored in invoices. >>>> >>>> https://bitbucket.org/trytonspain/trytond-account_invoice_consecutive >>> I see you also have a check for invoice_date == accounting_date for out >>> invoices. I'm wondering if we should also include this constraint in the >>> base. >> According to our knowledge this constraint is definitely wrong for Germany: >> >> The accounting date has to be >> - the date of the delivery for imputed taxation > But I guess there are some constraint. You can not put a date that is on > a closed fiscal year for example. Or I think it will be very strange to > have an invoice with a date in year Y (with numbering of year Y) and the > accounting date in Y-1. Think of this case which is very common if the delivery and the invoicing is done separately:
1. Delivery on 2015-12-30 -> accounting_date = 2015-12-30 2. Invoicing on 2016-01-04 -> invoice_date = 2015-01-04 In Germany the rules for invoice numbering are not very strict. I did a quick research but did not find any rule that the invoice number cannot be from the 2015 sequence in this case. But i would prefer to have it from the 2016 sequence. So i would say that at least in Germany the sequence should be selected depending on the invoice date. -- ___________________________________ virtual things Preisler & Spallek GbR München - Aachen Windeckstr. 77 81375 München Tel: +49 (89) 710 481 55 Fax: +49 (89) 710 481 56 [email protected] http://www.virtual-things.biz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/568E6DB6.6050500%40googlemail.com.
