On 07.01.2016 15:04, Mathias Behrle wrote: > * 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton: " Re: [tryton] RFC: Invoice sequences" > (Thu, > 7 Jan 2016 14:52:54 +0100): > >> On 07.01.2016 12:53, Cédric Krier wrote: >>> On 2016-01-07 12:28, Mathias Behrle wrote: >>>> * Cédric Krier: " Re: [tryton] RFC: Invoice sequences" (Sat, 26 Dec 2015 >>>> 15:10:15 +0100): >>>> >>>>> On 2015-12-25 22:26, Jordi Esteve (Zikzakmedia) wrote: >>>>>> El 24/12/15 a les 15:06, Cédric Krier ha escrit: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Following the previous discussions about the invoice sequence and the >>>>>>> fiscal year, I have started a feature request to improve the situation >>>>>>> and manage more cases. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://bugs.tryton.org/issue5205 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please comment if the proposal could be in conflict with your local >>>>>>> usage. >>>>>> The new proposal (a check when setting the number on an invoice to ensure >>>>>> that the invoice date not before any invoice dates numbered with the same >>>>>> sequence) fits well the Spanish law and practice. >>>>>> >>>>>> In fact, the Spanish team maintains a module [1] that implements this >>>>>> idea with some restrictions because the sequence is not yet stored in >>>>>> invoices. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://bitbucket.org/trytonspain/trytond-account_invoice_consecutive >>>>> I see you also have a check for invoice_date == accounting_date for out >>>>> invoices. I'm wondering if we should also include this constraint in the >>>>> base. >>>> According to our knowledge this constraint is definitely wrong for Germany: >>>> >>>> The accounting date has to be >>>> - the date of the delivery for imputed taxation >>> But I guess there are some constraint. You can not put a date that is on >>> a closed fiscal year for example. Or I think it will be very strange to >>> have an invoice with a date in year Y (with numbering of year Y) and the >>> accounting date in Y-1. >> Think of this case which is very common if the delivery and the >> invoicing is done separately: >> >> 1. Delivery on 2015-12-30 -> accounting_date = 2015-12-30 >> 2. Invoicing on 2016-01-04 -> invoice_date = 2015-01-04 > This should be a minor typo? > => 2. Invoicing on 2016-01-04 -> invoice_date = 2016-01-04 yes. sorry. 2016-01-04 is correct.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/568E7212.5050409%40googlemail.com.
