* 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton: " Re: [tryton] RFC: Invoice sequences" (Thu, 7 Jan 2016 14:54:49 +0100):
> On 07.01.2016 14:13, Axel Braun wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2016, 13:47:57 schrieb Mathias Behrle:
> >>>> According to our knowledge this constraint is definitely wrong for
> >>>> Germany:
> >>>>
> >>>> The accounting date has to be
> >>>> - the date of the delivery for imputed taxation
> >>> I would say, the date of invoice. You dont always have a delivery (service
> >>> charges)
> >> In case of service you have to indicate the time of supply. Invoices
> >> missing those dates are strictly spoken invalid.
> > True from a taxation point of view. But your invoice has not to be on the
> > last day of the period (or something like this)
> >
> >> Either you point to a delivery
> >> date (e.g. on a delivery note) or you have to explicitely write on the
> >> invoice, that the delivery date is the same as the invoice date.
> > As we are just in a go-live in Germany, I have asked our experts....the
> > delivery date has no relation to the invoice date. They are completely
> > independent. If you think about collective invoices etc that makes sense.
> >
> > Invoice date is relevant for accounting, taxation and payment terms.
> This is not correct. The accounting_date is relevant for the accounting
> and for the taxation. The invoice_date is relevant for the payment term.
Seconded.
--
Mathias Behrle
MBSolutions
Gilgenmatten 10 A
D-79114 Freiburg
Tel: +49(761)471023
Fax: +49(761)4770816
http://www.m9s.biz
UStIdNr: DE 142009020
PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0x8405BBF6
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"tryton" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/20160107150330.3384b7f1%40monsterix.mbehrle.de.
pgpWz8NWd7z8t.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
