On 2016-05-03 08:08, pgm.lam...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 4:05:04 PM UTC+2, Cédric Krier wrote: > > > > On 2016-05-03 05:49, pgm.l...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 12:00:04 PM UTC+2, Cédric Krier wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2016-05-03 02:25, pgm.l...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote: > > > > > Cédric, made the list because there was a discussion about this. > > > > > > > > I mean I can not understand/read what it means. The formatting is > > > > strange. Please elaborate it. > > > > Cédric, just don't like discussions about the accounting date. For > > > > > delivery its the delivery date, for the invoice its the invoice > > date. > > > > I still don't understand this answer. > > > > > > > I'm afraid that Issue5205 still does not accept the freedom that > > many > > > > > countries have with invoice dates and numbers. In your mail of > > > > 24-12-2015 > > > > > you write: > > > > > > > > > > "...to ensure that the invoice date not before any invoice dates > > > > numbered with the same sequence ..." > > > > > > > > > > But maybe I misunderstand your text ... I hope ... ... > > > > > > > > This means that invoice number must follow a increasing sequence > > number > > > > when ordered by invoice date. > > > > For the sequence, its right that a new invoice gets the increasing > > sequence > > > > > number. Of course. > > > > > But .... this has no relation with any date ... > > > > > The number of a new invoice is always the last invoice number +1, > > but > > > > > sometime the date of the new invoice is before the last invoice > > date. > > > > I don't think this is allowed in any country. If you know one country > > where this behaviour is allowed please share. > > > > > > Could you name at least one country where numbering invoice should not > > > > follow at least this rule? > > > > Unfortunately I still don't know your "when ordered by invoice date". > > > > Sorry. > > > > Usually the rules of invoice numbering in countries is like this: > > > > 2015-12-20: INV-0018 > > 2015-12-21: INV-0019 > > 2015-12-22: INV-0020 > > > > 2016-01-02: INV-0001 > > 2016-01-03: INV-0002 > > > > even if INV-0002 was created before INV-0020 > > This means that if you look at the generated invoice over one fiscal > > year ordered by invoice date, you must see only increasing and > > continuous numbering. > > > > Very clean explanation Cédri. Thanks!!! > > In these countries I have the possibility to create 2015-12-22: INV-0020 > in 2016, after INV-0002.
In which countries??? > > issue5205 is about not resetting the sequence so we will have: > > > > 2015-12-20: INV-0018 > > 2015-12-21: INV-0019 > > 2015-12-22: INV-0020 > > > > 2016-01-02: INV-0021 > > 2016-01-03: INV-0022 > > > > But we can not allow to do this: > > > > 2015-12-20: INV-0018 > > 2015-12-21: INV-0019 > > 2015-12-22: INV-0022 > > > > 2016-01-02: INV-0020 > > 2016-01-03: INV-0021 > > > > In the Netherlands I created 2015-12-22: INV-0022 in 2016, after creating > 2016-01-03: INV-0021. Did it in Exact, the largest financial application in > this country. > Within the discussion Vincent Bastos wrote: ... or my part ( Australia ), > the sequence is not important. As you can see in the links below, the ATO ( > Australian Taxation Office ) does not require an invoice to have a number > :)... we are pretty easy going down under. ... > At least the Netherlands and Australia don't have rules for numbering the > invoices. I can understand that Australia doesn't care about invoice numbering because they doesn't have VAT. But in Netherlands, I have some doubt, it is not because a software allow to do it that it is the truth. By the way, are you sure that the accounting date is really in the past? > > Because if there is a fiscal control for the year 2015, the controller > > can not know if the hole between INV-0019 and INV-0022 is because there > > are invoices on another fiscal year or if it is a tax fraud by hiding > > invoices. > > > > In the view of invoices with invoice number as order, the controller can > see, that there are no missing numbers. No fraud. How can he see the invoice for the next fiscal year when he is verifying the current fiscal year? > Note that I'm talking about the accounting date which is most of the > > time the same as the invoice date, except usually during the period of > > fiscal year change. > > > > I don't understand that the invoice date can be different from the > accounting date when the year changes ... Korbinian answered -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/20160503154011.GN13326%40tetsuo.
