On Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 12:00:04 PM UTC+2, Cédric Krier wrote: > > On 2016-05-03 02:25, pgm.l...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote: > > Cédric, made the list because there was a discussion about this. > > I mean I can not understand/read what it means. The formatting is > strange. Please elaborate it. > Cédric, just don't like discussions about the accounting date. For > > delivery its the delivery date, for the invoice its the invoice date.
> > I'm afraid that Issue5205 still does not accept the freedom that many > > countries have with invoice dates and numbers. In your mail of > 24-12-2015 > > you write: > > > > "...to ensure that the invoice date not before any invoice dates > numbered with the same sequence ..." > > > > But maybe I misunderstand your text ... I hope ... ... > > This means that invoice number must follow a increasing sequence number > when ordered by invoice date. > For the sequence, its right that a new invoice gets the increasing sequence > > number. Of course. > > But .... this has no relation with any date ... > > The number of a new invoice is always the last invoice number +1, but > > sometime the date of the new invoice is before the last invoice date. > Could you name at least one country where numbering invoice should not > follow at least this rule? > Unfortunately I still don't know your "when ordered by invoice date". > Sorry. > > > PS: Please don't top-post on this mailing list if you want your future > posts not be moderated, see http://groups.tryton.org/netiquette > > -- > Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL > Email/Jabber: cedric...@b2ck.com <javascript:> > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/3a31d8fc-517a-46ff-a5ad-48162b2cf59a%40googlegroups.com.
