Paul F: >> http://www.hwb.no/artikkel/15307
> Thanks Vidar. How come your posts always show up as file attachments that I > have to open? Might be because my messages are signed and your email client doesn't like it. > I wish I could find an online Nor>Eng translation so I could > review that article. I don't really see what it is claiming; what RAID > levels are tested and when it has a controller card but says SW raid that IS > fakeraid right not linux kernel raid? Do any of these tests show RAID 1, 5 > or 10 performance with kernel raid? - RAID-1 - SW means kernel RAID, HW means true hardware Software RAID is usually kernel RAID when talking about Linux, and driver-controlled RAID is often referred to as fakeraid. Using either sw or hw RAID will most likely not be a critical decision for you. And unless you get to try both under the conditions of real life, you can never be sure you made the right choice. To me the sellingpoint is not performance as I will never reach the limits here. To me it's ease and flexibility that counts, and to me that's what a kernel SW RAID will give.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
