Might be because my messages are signed and your email client doesn't like it.
> I wish I could find an online Nor>Eng translation so I could review > that article. I don't really see what it is claiming; what RAID levels > are tested and when it has a controller card but says SW raid that IS > fakeraid right not linux kernel raid? Do any of these tests show RAID > 1, 5 or 10 performance with kernel raid? >> - RAID-1 >> - SW means kernel RAID, HW means true hardware >> Software RAID is usually kernel RAID when talking about Linux, and driver-controlled RAID is often referred >> to as fakeraid. >> Using either sw or hw RAID will most likely not be a critical decision for you. And unless you get to try >> both under the conditions of real life, you can never be sure you made the right choice. >> To me the sellingpoint is not performance as I will never reach the limits here. To me it's ease and >> flexibility that counts, and to me that's what a kernel SW RAID will give. OK thanks again just a few more ?'s then: a) TSL still uses EVMS right? b) Only available levels are 0,1,5 and 1+0 or other levels that might be able to sustain 2 failed drives are not available? c) Do you include swap partition in arrays? d) Is hot swap possible? How about hot spare? e) Are scripts readily available to report health/failure events? _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
