Rafal Krzewski wrote:
>
> Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> > > I think that Turbine does not compile on JSDK 2.0 for some two months,
> > > and nobody is complainig. Maybe it's time to drop the support?
> >
> > Then that needs to be fixed. I'm complaining.
>
> Not my itch, sorry :-)
>
> Rafal
The usual method for getting some code fixed that was submitted which
contains code that does not compile under a supported platform is to
have the developer who submitted the code fix it. It seems the classes
in question are TurbineConfig and ContentURI.
You submitted TurbineConfig, though IIRC it was in response to requests
by several people, so it may not be fair to ask you to fix it. The fix
for 2.0 compliance is to remove a couple unused methods, but they must
be implemented in 2.2, so I do not see an easy fix other than to give
notice of the needed changes or to provide an alternate implementation.
ContentURI is similar in that I only see an alternate implementation as
the fix, but I think this can wait for someone to ask for it.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
