on 1/17/01 4:05 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree. What you described is the major limitting factor imposed on > me whenever I want to pick and choose pieces of Turbine to use in > Tigris. Remember that the *initial* goal of Turbine was not to be used in a piecemeal fashion like that. Therefore a lot of the code shows that. I'm willing to see this changed though I'm not willing to do all the work required to do so. I think that this should become a requirement before release though. thanks, -jon ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Daniel Rall
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins raphael . luta
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins raphael . luta
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- RE: Turbine Services as plugins Chris Campbell
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Daniel Rall
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Daniel Rall
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Rapha�l Luta
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Rafal Krzewski
- Re: [PATCH] 6 files w/ deprecated methods Rafal Krzewski
- Re: [PATCH] 6 files w/ deprecated methods Jon Stevens
- Re: [PATCH] 6 files w/ deprecated methods Rafal Krzewski
- Re: [PATCH] 6 files w/ deprecated methods John McNally
- Re: [PATCH] 6 files w/ deprecated methods raphael . luta
- Re: [PATCH] 6 files w/ deprecated methods Jon Stevens
- Re: [PATCH] 6 files w/ deprecated methods Rafal Krzewski
