John McNally wrote:
> The usual method for getting some code fixed that was submitted which
> contains code that does not compile under a supported platform is to
> have the developer who submitted the code fix it. It seems the classes
> in question are TurbineConfig and ContentURI.
>
> You submitted TurbineConfig, though IIRC it was in response to requests
> by several people, so it may not be fair to ask you to fix it. The fix
> for 2.0 compliance is to remove a couple unused methods, but they must
> be implemented in 2.2, so I do not see an easy fix other than to give
> notice of the needed changes or to provide an alternate implementation.
Uh sorry, I thing I went a bit to far... I submited the file because
people were asking to in, and I said I didn't know how to solve the
2.0/2.2 problem in an elegant way, once it was reported.
Writing an alternate implementation would be easy, but I still don't
know how to solve the building issue - some ant tricks are neccessary.
Rafal
--
Rafal Krzewski
Senior Internet Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
