Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on 1/17/01 4:05 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I agree. What you described is the major limitting factor imposed on
> > me whenever I want to pick and choose pieces of Turbine to use in
> > Tigris.
>
> Remember that the *initial* goal of Turbine was not to be used in a
> piecemeal fashion like that. Therefore a lot of the code shows that. I'm
> willing to see this changed though I'm not willing to do all the work
> required to do so.
Understandable. I think that the sign of a great piece of software is
in fact the flexiblity to be used in a piecemeal fashion and in ways
not originally intended. Reducing internal coupling would go a very
long way towards making this a reality (e.g. don't pass a RunData when
just a couple of Strings are required by a method).
> I think that this should become a requirement before release though.
Think of it more as something to strive for as Turbine continues to
develop. :)
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
