Re: Turbine Services as plugins

[Daniel Rall]

"Chris Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Shouldn't RunData be an interface then? This would also have the benefit of
> making Turbine more flexible for presentaion other than HTML (WML, etc.) as
> different presentaion types could implement specialized RunData's.

Having it be a empty or nearly empty interface would be ideal.  The
current implementation has so much stuff in it that I have little
interest in using a lot of Turbine classes that depend on it in a
non-Turbine context.
-- 

Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]