Re: Turbine Services as plugins

[Jon Stevens]

on 1/17/01 1:08 PM, "Daniel Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Having it be a empty or nearly empty interface would be ideal.  The
> current implementation has so much stuff in it that I have little
> interest in using a lot of Turbine classes that depend on it in a
> non-Turbine context.

Right, I see your point...I just fixed the problem.

-jon

-- 
Honk if you love peace and quiet.




------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]