on 1/17/01 12:41 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, I was not talking about this RunData issue because it's true that > the RunDataFactory can be made configurable and produces subclasses of RunData > (not currently implemented though). > > The issue I refered to was that any service referencing RunData in its > interface > inherited a dependency through this class to ECS, Turbine User and > AccessController, > Turbine Template system, etc... It's definitely an issue when you're talking > componentization. Right, but a service itself doesn't have to have a RunData object passed into it...I guess I'm not seeing the real problem here... -jon -- Honk if you love peace and quiet. ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins John Thorhauer
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Rafal Krzewski
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- RE: Turbine Services as plugins Chris Campbell
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins raphael . luta
- RE: Turbine Services as plugins Chris Campbell
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Daniel Rall
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins raphael . luta
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins raphael . luta
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- RE: Turbine Services as plugins Chris Campbell
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Daniel Rall
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Daniel Rall
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Rapha�l Luta
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Rafal Krzewski
