on 1/17/01 12:58 PM, "Chris Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shouldn't RunData be an interface then? This would also have the benefit of > making Turbine more flexible for presentaion other than HTML (WML, etc.) as > different presentaion types could implement specialized RunData's. > > ../Chris Yes. It just never happened. :-( -jon -- Honk if you love peace and quiet. ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jason van Zyl
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins John Thorhauer
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Rafal Krzewski
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- RE: Turbine Services as plugins Chris Campbell
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins raphael . luta
- RE: Turbine Services as plugins Chris Campbell
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Daniel Rall
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins raphael . luta
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins raphael . luta
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- RE: Turbine Services as plugins Chris Campbell
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Daniel Rall
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Jon Stevens
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Daniel Rall
- Re: Turbine Services as plugins Rapha�l Luta
