On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:07:24PM -0000, Magnus ?or Torfason wrote:
> Hm, what about using BufferedImage and Jimi. Have you tried that stuff?
> That does not require an X server. (Im guessing you are using the AWT
> classes). I have been using that, and that is completely stable (on W2K).
I looked at Jimi, but I don't think it obviates the need for an X server
on Linux. AWT on W2K doesn't need an X server anyway.
(see my reply to Jeff though - PJA did the trick).
> On a related note, I have some pretty primitive graph classes myself. Is
> this something we might wish to contribute to the ever extending
> turbine.util collection?
Sounds like a great plan - unfortunately the graphing code I've based my
code on has a GPL-like license. I've written to the author (who doesn't
seem to be maintaining his code) asking permission to release the code
under the Apache license, so I'll let you know...
--
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Soy un hombre: nada humano me es extrano
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
