>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:07:24PM -0000, Magnus ?or Torfason wrote:
> > Hm, what about using BufferedImage and Jimi. Have you tried that stuff?
> > That does not require an X server. (Im guessing you are using the AWT
> > classes). I have been using that, and that is completely
> stable (on W2K).
>
> I looked at Jimi, but I don't think it obviates the need for an X server
> on Linux. AWT on W2K doesn't need an X server anyway.
>
> (see my reply to Jeff though - PJA did the trick).
Yeah, I saw that. Actually I was refering to BufferedImage when I said that
one could get rid of the X server. No you obviously do not need an X server
for AWT on windows, but I believe that with BufferedImage you do not even
need AWT. At least not the native classes, that I believe were called peers
in jdk1.1. Anyway, I might be mistaken on that issue.
> > On a related note, I have some pretty primitive graph classes
> myself. Is
> > this something we might wish to contribute to the ever extending
> > turbine.util collection?
>
> Sounds like a great plan - unfortunately the graphing code I've based my
> code on has a GPL-like license. I've written to the author (who doesn't
> seem to be maintaining his code) asking permission to release the code
> under the Apache license, so I'll let you know...
Great, keep me posted.
> --
> Sean Legassick
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Soy un hombre: nada humano me es extrano
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
