Christoph Zwerschke schrieb: > Basically, I agree with your suggestions for the 1.x releases, but I > would not desupport 1.0. Keep in mind that it's currently the only > stable and officially released branch. Also 1.1 uses different > site-packages and does not run on Py 2.3. So we should continue to > maintain 1.0 for quite a while. This will also strengthen confidence > that TG is a stable platform.
I think that we should finally stick to only fixing security issues and critical bugs in 1.0.x, like, IMHO, we always intended after the 1.0.4 release. This *is* what I call maintaining. As Ken pointed out, it becomes more and more work to maintain three branches at the same time and backporting new features to 1.0 from 1.1 / 1.5 becomes more and more difficult (especially with the introduction of WebTest it means that you have to write most of the tests twice) and holds back refactoring of the 1.1 code, which is IMHO dearly needed in some areas. People can still run their 1.0 apps on the 1.0.x releases and will get security and important bug fixes. But if they want new features, they should port their apps to 1.1, which currently is a no-brainer. But the longer we hold back a 1.1. release, the bigger the gap will be and gives people less time to adapt their apps. Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
