On Thu, 2008-21-08 at 17:37 +0200, Florent Aide wrote: > > Ken, > > I fully agree with this. > I have two questions here: > > 1°/ Is 1.5 ready for a beta release? How much work would still be > required in it? > 2°/ Does anyone else have an objection to release of the 1.1 branch > (1.1beta1) in 24 hours? If anyone has some patches/pet tickets please > say so now. > > 1.1 is pretty darn stable and really needs a release. I'll go for a > beta because we'll inevitably have questions coming from our user base > and I want to be able to release a real 1.1 after 2 weeks. > > In our first vision we wanted to have TW in the 1.1 release but it > seems to be non realistic. I am completely ok with you to get this in > the 1.5 branch instead of the 1.1 (which is a sine qua non condition > to be able to release 1.1 beta). > > Last but not least: I'd like to warmly and publicly thank you & Luke > Macken for all the efforts you've put in TurboGears 1.x development!
+1 million! I believe that having a supported "stable" branch and a transition branch with CP3 will really make a huge difference to TG adoption. It gives me confidence that the release schedule is being driven by a solid plan. Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
