On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 15:01 -0400, Mark Ramm wrote: <snip>
> The only caviat is that I want there to be a clear, dedicated ORM > connectivity solution for SQLObject users too, so we can maximize our > backwards compatibility. > Storm does that. >From the sqlobject.py module in the Storm repo: http://codebrowse.launchpad.net/~storm/storm/trunk/annotate/gustavo% 40niemeyer.net-20070712161354-rxeu08ktyke4kyg4?file_id=sqlobject.py-20070205114412-z3wdv063qyh16wal-1 """ 233 95.1.10.1.... class SQLObjectBase(Storm): 234 95.1.10.1.... """The root class of all SQLObject-emulating classes in your application. 235 236 The general strategy for using Storm's SQLObject emulation layer 237 is to create an application-specific subclass of SQLObjectBase 238 (probably named "SQLObject") that provides an implementation of 239 95.1.10.1.... _get_store to return an instance of L{storm.store.Store}. It may 240 even be implemented as returning a global L{Store} instance. Then 241 all database classes should subclass that class. 242 95.1.10.1.... """ """ /me ducks :-) > --Mark -- - jmj --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
