On 7/12/07, Jeremy M. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 15:01 -0400, Mark Ramm wrote: > > <snip> > > > The only caviat is that I want there to be a clear, dedicated ORM > > connectivity solution for SQLObject users too, so we can maximize our > > backwards compatibility. > > > > Storm does that.
Cool! That does look interesting. Though what they are doing is not exactly what I was talking about, (I just want a copy of the current TurboGears package hub, that lets users connect to SQLObject, but as a seprate project) but what Storm appears to have done is much more interesting! > > /me ducks :-) No need to duck. If storm provides a clear upgrade path from SQLObject we should let SQLOBject users know about that, and do what we can to support it. I still tend to think that should be done in a package outside of the TurboGears core, but we should actively look for someone to do it, and actively support it as a semi-official third party package. But I'm open to be influenced by smart people with good arguments. :) --Mark --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
