Lots of folks don't understand trademark law. Other folks are mad because they've been asked to stop selling spam-o- trons.
I can't fault Twitter for their behavior in this matter. On Aug 14, 11:42 am, David Fisher <tib...@gmail.com> wrote: > How are some of you failing to see the difference between "Powered by > Twitter" being something they want you to do and "http:// > TwitterApplication.com" is something they don't want you to do? > > Why don't they want the latter? Because someone with the email of > "adultsexdatin...@googlemail.com" registered the domain. Not exactly > the type of company that Twitter wants to associate itself with. Yet, > for applications and sites that DO comply with the ToS, they want an > attribution and link back to their site. Aren't some of you self > proclaimed SEO/Marketing experts? Everyone wants links back to their > site, including Twitter. > > Making a logo downloadable doesn't mean either that they want you to > use it, or their font on your website when doing your own branding. > > Some people here are confused > > dave