There are more colors (or shades of grey) in my world than just black and
white...

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you're an entrpreneur with strong ethical standards, then never
> ever accept investment capital.
>
> Investors could not give a shit about your ethical qualms or
> objections, and they are most certainly not going to accept a lower
> exit because of them  If you don't play ball, they simply replace you
> with someone who will.
>
> Whenever I read about an entrepreneur joyously announcing that he got
> such-and-such amount of venture capital, I think to myself, "Dude (or
> dudess), I hope you realize that you have just sold your soul and
> handed over control of your destiny to someone else."
>
> On Apr 10, 4:23 pm, "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <zn...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
> > On 04/10/2010 11:45 AM, Arnaud Meunier wrote:
> >
> > > We shouldn’t “fill holes” anymore, Wilson said. The thing is Twitter
> > > has deliberately kept a lot of holes opened, encouraging us to fill
> > > them (and lots of applications have been doing it with innovation, by
> > > the way).
> >
> > I don't know that it's "deliberate" - a lot of it has to do with the
> > growth dynamics of the Twitter ecosystem in particular and "social
> > media" in general. I've been on Twitter since early 2007 - in fact,
> > @znmeb predates @twitter. ;-) It was an "exclusive club" and something
> > that relatively few people knew about.
> >
> > I used Twitter rarely until the "financial crisis" of fall 2008. Maybe
> > it's a coincidence, but I don't think it is, that the main growth spurt
> > in Twitter user IDs (http://meb.tw/b6WCzv) began towards the end of 2008
> > after the election of Barack Obama brought national media attention to
> > Twitter. That was when I discovered the Portland Twitter community and
> > began using Twitter "in earnest."
> >
> > Wilson is a venture capitalist - he takes *calculated* risks. He blogs
> > to help his investments pay off, so his clients make money, thereby
> > attracting more money to his firm. He is on the board of *directors* of
> > Twitter. Directors *direct*. They may also advise, but I'm not privy to
> > the exact mix of direction and advice he provides. In any event, he is
> > no doubt keenly aware of the dynamics of the ecosystem. His advice, as
> > expressed in his blog post, is worth consideration.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Now we’re supposed to dig, create new holes, and fill them. Okay!
> > > There are a lot of ideas to have around Twitter, lots of new holes to
> > > dig.
> >
> > There are also numerous open positions at Twitter. Some of the holes
> > Twitter wants to fill appear to be "revealed" in the job descriptions.
> ;-)
> >
> > > But the question is still the same: "What will be left up to the
> > > ecosystem and what will be created on the platform?"
> >
> > Because of the growth dynamics in social media, I don't think anyone, in
> > the Twitter ecosystem or outside of it, can answer that. There are some
> > (fairly) simple models of such things, but human behavior is hard to
> > predict and bloggers and pundits and VCs can only speculate, collect as
> > many hard numbers as possible and build models with them.
> >
> > > I think I'm not the only one here to fear that Twitter itself begins
> > > to compete with the applications I created (or I plan to create). Yes,
> > > it's fun to dig holes and to fill them. But it also takes time and
> > > money, and it's like the game was going to be much more risky than it
> > > used to be.
> >
> > Again, that's not necessarily certain as long as there are uncertainties
> > in Twitter usage patterns and in the competitive landscape of "social
> > media". Wilson's blog post is, I believe, a pretty good overview of the
> > current state of the ecosystem, but how it evolves is not independent of
> > the competition and the consumer. And neither is the allocation of
> > resources between the Twitter entity and third party developers, large
> > and small.
> >
> > --
> > M. Edward (Ed) Boraskyhttp://
> borasky-research.net/about-smartznmeb/@znmeb
> >
> > "A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems." ~ Paul
> Erdős
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
>

Reply via email to