I would prefer to go with RedHat... The license agreement says "Unix". The platform migration fee is ~$10k. I suspect that their lawyer would say that while Linux may be a flavor of Unix, we would still be on the hook to pay the migration fee.
Bill -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Schasny Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 12:33 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: UV on SCO Unix Why not Linux? -----Original Message----- From: Brutzman, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 10:35 AM To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: UV on SCO Unix We bought the year-end UV amnesty upgrade from IBM. Because of an existing ERP license agreement, we need to stay with "Unix". While I would prefer to stay with HP-Ux, pricing for a new HP-Ux server seems to be approaching $10,000. Right now, I am not sure if it makes any sense to upgrade hardware in our HP-9000-E45 box. We would rather spend $3k. Thus, I am considering running SCO on say a Dell server. Any comments on running UV on SCO ? Perhaps there is another "Unix" besides SCO... Bill Brutzman, Manager IT HK MetalCraft Mfg Corp PO Box 775 35 Industrial Road Lodi NJ 07644-0775 973.471.7770 x145 .voice 973.471.9666 .fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.hkMetalCraft.com -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
