They just want us to pay them American dollars. They messed up on the licensing agreement. They re-wrote the agreement to cover our existing situation and merely specifed "Unix".
Right now, they regret the way they wrote this license agreement. They want customers to pay for a platform migration from anything to anything else. While I offered them $1k for a single sheet of paper, they want more like $10k. --Bill -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jefferson, Jim Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 1:33 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: UV on SCO Unix I guess what I'm saying is that HP-UX is a "flavor" of Unix. If they don't have a problem with you moving from HP-UX to SCO, they shouldn't have one if you choose AIX or Redhat or SuSE instead. I wonder if the restriction is there to cover them if you chose to move to Windows? Jim -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 12:33 PM To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE: UV on SCO Unix Maybe they should have...but they did not. It looks like "...will provide a non-exclusive license for the licensee to use the following Application Software and Documentation at fees shown below on one _____ Unix _____ Computer to be located only at Licensee's Installation Address, under the Terms and Conditions shown on the reverse." --Bill -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users