Brian,

Correct me if I am wrong... 
IBM Says "UV is an Extended relational database"
Well Some people call it MVDBMS. I wonder how this is different
from Nested Table Data Structure within any RDBMS.

Can you explain?

> Complex processing managed locally to
> the
> database, without having to add external business rule layers.
> Not as a dumb machine to return or update record sets.

I don't know how others are using UV... But I have only seen it being
used
as a DUMB FILE... with NO Rules Embedded in the DataBase.

No Relational Data... and No Business Rules..

All Rules are Embedded within Programs (PICK)... So basically taking
Data
out of its Container to do a bunch of Business Logic.

How is the above efficient?

Thanks,
Joe Eugene



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Brian Leach
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 11:53 AM
> To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
> Subject: RE: Modern Universe - was: The lists are closing
> 
> Joe,
> 
> I shouldn't even dignify this crap with a reply, but anyway ...
> 
> 
> "1. Populate UV and Oracle with around 10 Million records.
> 2. Write fairly complex Web Application against it.
> 3. Run a Web Application Stress tool(around 1000 Users)
>    switching Databases within the same DB Machine."
> 
> We've written complex web applications against UniVerse with several
> hundred
> permanently active users for local government systems (not just simple
> e-commerce or dynamic web). And they perform excellently, thank you.
> 
> 
> "UV is used as a FLAT FILE...
> with a bunch of Stuff..packed on it.. and then use PICK  to read
through
> these UV Files."
> 
> Then you're not using it correctly are you? Which puts you in no
position
> to
> comment.
> Don't blame the technology for your incompetence in not making the
correct
> use of it.
> 
> MVDB is designed for embedded processing. Record level writes that
don't
> have the overhead of a SQL layer. Complex processing managed locally
to
> the
> database, without having to add external business rule layers.
> 
> Not as a dumb machine to return or update record sets.
> 
> In other words, comparing UV and an RDBMS are comparing chalk and
cheese.
> They do different jobs. Try to use UV in the same way as Oracle and
don't
> be
> surprised if it won't perform. Try to use Oracle in the same way as UV
and
> the same thing happens. It doesn't work.
> 
> Strangely if I tried to drive a formula 1 car around here it won't
perform
> either. It would just break under the conditions. You need a 4x4. Of
> course
> they do the same thing - both go from A to B loudly and guzzle fuel.
But I
> know which one will get me home. Without an array of engineers to
retune
> it
> every day.
> 
> 
> "but I don't belive Corporations use UV as RDBMS..."
> 
> If they are they should be shot. UV is NOT an RDBMS. It's an MVDBMS.
If
> you
> can't understand that, no wonder you're floundering. A hell of a lot
of
> local and central governments, defence forces, fortune 500 companies
use
> UV
> as an MVDBMS though - as does a lot of the SMI sector, that can't
afford
> Oracle.
> 
> 
> "I belive developers should appreciate technology for
> 
> 1. Performance
> 2. Scalability
> 3. Ease Of Integration.
> 4. Advanced Techniques.
> 5. Resources for Development... RAD etc."
> 
> I do. That's why I've developed with Borland products for 10 years and
> with
> Microsoft products for 15 years.
> And MV databases for even longer.
> 
> Working with primitive data stores like SQL Server and Oracle just
loses
> my
> will to live.
> 
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
> This email was checked on leaving Microgen for viruses, similar
> malicious code and inappropriate content by MessageLabs SkyScan.
> 
> DISCLAIMER
> 
> This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be
> privileged.
> 
> If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender
> immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other
> person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information.
> 
> In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please
> contact the sender or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Microgen Information Management Solutions
> http://www.microgen.co.uk
> --
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to