My friend Tomas loves NetXMS. Another product from Riga. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Terry Duchcherer" <[email protected]> 
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 4:21:04 PM 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 



Just going to throw something out. http://www.netxms.org has a great user 
interface and a lot of functionality already built in. May also be worth a look 
as a starting point. 

Terry 
NETAGO 




From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Chris Ruschmann 
Sent: December-02-14 3:15 PM 
To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 

That would be most often, Josh may be the best to get this and post it to the 
dev site. 

Dev servers are up and I am going to start working on the DB design here 
tonight. 



From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected] ] On 
Behalf Of Sam Tetherow 
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 11:15 AM 
To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 

I've got a breakdown and php code for the UBNT discovery protocol for anyone 
who is interested and I've parse chunks for the config files to check various 
settings. 

On 12/02/2014 01:56 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: 



hangout created :) 

josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com 
On 12/02/2014 10:51 AM, Chris Ruschmann wrote: 
<blockquote>

There are a couple ways to build a database to facilitate this. I built a 
custom monitoring system for our IT billing system several years ago that we 
can go off. 

Shall we setup a Hangouts to go over things? I think this could be a killer 
tool. 



From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected] ] On 
Behalf Of Josh Reynolds 
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:26 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 


As long as it's something simple with a rudimentary API to build off of, I see 
no reason why multiple polling/control types couldn't be designed. 

Select a subnet, select types of polling to perform (ubnt discovery, whatever 
cambium uses, etc), select admin/password for groups of devices, and add them 
to the database. Once in the da tabase their is a int pollin gFrequency = x ; 
and str poll T ype = y; and str pollTemplate = z; , where pollType could be 
"snmp, ssh, agent" and pollTemplate could be "ubnt,cambium-ePmP, mikrotik", 
etc. josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: 
www.spitwspots.com 
On 12/02/2014 10:15 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: 
<blockquote>


My thought is that as we grow, we'll have different types of equipment out 
there... UBNT, MT, Cambium, Mimosa, Netonix, SAF, Exalt, servers, etc. In my 36 
hours of experience, it seems like that would be the platform to build off of. 
*shrugs* 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> 
To: "ubnt users" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 1:08:12 PM 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 

Via Adam? 

Not likely. 

I'm doing some work on making sure the new UBNT MIBs are c lean and standards 
based. That may not be a required part of the puzzle though -- snmp is pretty 
slow. Aircontrol works by authenticating initially as admin, exchanging ssh 
keys, and then using the device itself to poll stats and send them upstream (I 
believe, it's been awhile since I've looked into this). 

I know the proper commands to pull the stats we need for graphing and 
everything, and we know the ssh commands for upgrading and things like that. 

Diagnosing the config isn't hard, although the order of the config is often 
jumbled from device to devi c e and version to version -- but it's mostly the 
same. 

Just need somebody who can create a basic webpage with auth, load up x devices 
per page, a basic search function, and some sorts for organizing CPEs per AP 
MAC. 

Scheduling would be nice eventually. 

This can't be that hard. I used to do stuff far more complicated than this, but 
I haven't done any webdesign/css/php since like '99. josh reynolds :: chief 
information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com 
On 12/02/2014 09:55 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: 
<blockquote>


Think we could get enough stuff into Observium? It already pulls OS\package 
versions. So it knows what's running on it. It supports external apps. Maybe we 
could get a firmware push system into it. 

It has Rancid to pull configurations. Rancid can also push commands out to all 
of the devices. Setup a UBNT config file format for the pulling and setup a 
method to push configurations back out? 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> 
To: "ubnt users" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 12:45:53 PM 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 

looks like we're going to have to come up with a third party solution 

this sucks josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: 
www.spitwspots.com 
On 12/02/2014 09:41 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: 
<blockquote>



And that's the problem here... If they want to make a hosted thing with 
integrated billing that nobody seems to want, that's fine with me, but it isn't 
a replacement for airControl. 

Just make something that the basic functions work on (with all devices) that's 
somewhat reliable and I think most of us would be perfectly happy... I don't 
even care about stuff like maps, it just needs to be able to do firmware 
upgrades, make configuration changes and monitor devices. It doesn't have to be 
all that complicated. 




From: [email protected] [ [email protected] ] on behalf 
of Mike Hammett [ [email protected] ] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 12:21 PM 
To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 


With airCRM, airControl is dead. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> 
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 12:20:35 PM 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 

I think I’d be happy if AirControl just supported all the hardware they sell 
and if the AirGateway firmware gets out of Beta before the Cubs win the World 
Series. 

Rory 



From: [email protected] [ mailto:[email protected] ] On 
Behalf Of Mathew Howard 
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 11:08 AM 
To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 



true... I don't care if it's there either, but if they for some reason think 
the billing stuff needs to be kept on their servers where it's safe from our 
meddling, I'd be perfectly happy if they just cut it all out and let us have 
the useful part. 




From: [email protected] [ [email protected] ] on behalf 
of Mike Hammett [ [email protected] ] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 12:06 PM 
To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 


As long as they aren't dependent on each other (which I believe they already 
said), they don't have to remove billing. Keep it there for all I care, just 
let me install it locally. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> 
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 12:03:37 PM 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 


It doesn't seem like it should be all that complicated to just remove the 
billing parts and let us have the rest to run on our own servers... 




From: [email protected] [ [email protected] ] on behalf 
of Mike Hammett [ [email protected] ] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 11:43 AM 
To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 


*nods* I'll gladly take airCRM and load it on my existing on-net server and 
just not use the billing aspect. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Kees H" <[email protected]> 
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 11:41:26 AM 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 

 

Don't get me wrong. I would love it if the product works as advertised. But as 
with the unifi software. Allow me to load it on my server. That is all I ask 
for. 


<blockquote>


----- Original Message ----- 

From: Daniel Peoples 

To: Ubiquiti Users Group 

Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 9:13 AM 

Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 





Sorry, my brain works in mysterious ways(at least that's what my wife tells 
me). 
What I'm trying to say is let them take a stab at this, and objectively judge 
the final product. They might accidentally get it right. At worst, when it 
comes out of beta and doesn't work, don't use it and if enough folks do the 
same, they won't mess with it, it will be depreciated and the team that makes 
it will be re-assigned. 
Also, from the security standpoint I'm just saying that it won't be any more 
insecure than any other solution, just because it is a "cloud" based offering. 
Someone also made a comment that I interrupted as "cambium could do it better", 
to which I was just saying YES THEY CAN, because they have the additional 
financial assistance of a upscale ap/cpe combination to support it. 






Daniel Peoples 
Resonance Broadband 
Resonancebroadband.com 
918-429-3620 


On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > 
wrote: 


You've completely lost me. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Daniel Peoples" < [email protected] > 
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:57:46 AM 



Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 


The revenue of the epmp line doesn't support much. 
And actually, how much DOES cambium make off those things? 






Daniel Peoples 
Resonance Broadband 
Resonancebroadband.com 
918-429-3620 


On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > 
wrote: 


ePMP doesn't support what? 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Daniel Peoples" < [email protected] > 
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:52:00 AM 



Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 

Yes, but we both know that the epmp doesn't support this, the 450 does. 






Daniel Peoples 
Resonance Broadband 
Resonancebroadband.com 
918-429-3620 


On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > 
wrote: 


Cambium has CPE at $120 and APs at $500. Completely plausible to move over. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Daniel Peoples" < [email protected] > 
To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:42:38 AM 
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl 








Depending on the direction that the tool takes, it could be gold or a great big 
poo stain. 
If it is a free to use tool like ac1 or ac2, it will have that initial spert of 
awesome that will taper to nothing in a year or two. It will eventually be 
stuck by the wayside, as there just isn't enough margin in a $100 radio to 
support a tool like this. 
Can Cambium or anyone else like them do this better? Sure, but they have ap's 
that cost 10 times as much, and SM's that cost 4 to 5 times as much so they can 
support these tools. 
If it is a paid(MRC) billing platform, it will more than likely mature into 
something that is MUCH better than ac 1 or 2 , and something that actually on 
the billing side approaches a real billing software and CPE management system. 
All of this said, I run AC1 for management and swiftfox for billing, the two 
programs both do exactly what I want from them, and that is ALL I want them to 
do. If ubnt makes a product that does both functions and is around the same 
price or even higher per cpe, then hoo rah, saves me complexity in billing and 
management. 
As for the "cloud" side of this, yes it will always have more vulnerabilities 
than my ac1 server that doesn't even know where the internet is, but you have 
to put your billing system on the internet so that it can process a CC, and 
don't forget that your azotel or your powercode bmu sets IN the data stream. 
DDOS the box and your entire internet connection dies, because they have you to 
route the information through the hardware. 

BUT at the same time, my new installer doesn't even know that ac1 exists passed 
me showing him stat graphs, and he couldn't possibly hope to learn how you tie 
all of that stuff together to make the solid picture that I do when I look at 
all of the stuff together. 


I honestly don't see what all the nay saying is about. If they do it right, it 
will be a properly good tool, if they don't do it right, the adoption numbers 
will tell them that they did wrong. 






Daniel Peoples 
Resonance Broadband 
Resonancebroadband.com 
918-429-3620 


On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Justin Wilson < [email protected] > wrote: 
Thank you UBNT for treating your customers like they are just a bunch of 
hobbyists. There are many of us trying to run a business and having the 
proper tools to do that is essential. For several years we have been 
told that Air Control is being active developed, we have programmers 
working on it, etc. 

I have ran a small WISP (1800+ UBNT devices) and if it wasn¹t for the few 
piece of AC that worked it would have been a nightmare upgrading firmware, 
and checking on the worst performing clients. Sure, we could have spent 
countless hours on writing scripts, integrating with 3rd party tools, but 
I shouldn¹t have to. If you give me a tool, make it work at one point. I 
can get that Beta software is, just that, Beta Software. Has anyone at 
UBNT actually tried to manage 2000 devices? Upgrading firmware, making 
changes, monitoring, etc. 

It¹s insulting that we spend good money. At one point, we were spending 
20-30k a month buying UBNT products. I realize margins are thin, 
marketing, overhead, blah blah blah. But, if my folks spent less time 
monkeying with firmware upgrades and the like they could put on more 
customers. More customers means more revenue for UBNT. Not to mention 
the fact that I am sure there are operators out there who would PAY for a 
working AC. Why? Because it saves them labor! Saving labor means saving 
money! That¹s a benefit. There are reasons products like Observium and 
Nagios which have paid and free Versions. I would pay money if it meant I 
had less hassle. 

Cloud based for a network monitoring solution? Really? This is such a bad 
idea. How many years will this product be in Alpha or Beta? I installed 
the CMS from Cambium and guess what? It worked? Because it worked my 
client is now sold on Cambium. They see that its an integrated solution. 
Market toward the bean counters AND the geeks. Not just throw it out there. 

I know that¹s more than my .02 but dang. You missed the boat UBNT. 

Justin 


-- 
Justin Wilson < [email protected] > 
http://www.mtin.net < http://www.mtin.net/blog > 
Managed Services ­ xISP Solutions ­ Data Centers 
http://www.thebrotherswisp.com 
Podcast about xISP topics 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 
Peering ­ Transit ­ Internet Exchange 





_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 


_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 


_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 


_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 


_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 


_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 


_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 



_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 



_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 


_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 


_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 

_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 
</blockquote>



_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 

_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 
</blockquote>



_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 

_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 
</blockquote>




_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 
</blockquote>




_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 
</blockquote>


_______________________________________________ 
Ubnt_users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 

_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to