Jab has an old version of Powercode

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 2, 2014 11:25 PM, "Jay Weekley" <par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:

> What do companies like Jab and Wisper use?
>
>
> Josh Reynolds wrote:
> > As long as it's something simple with a rudimentary API to build off
> > of, I see no reason why multiple polling/control types couldn't be
> > designed.
> >
> > Select a subnet, select types of polling to perform (ubnt discovery,
> > whatever cambium uses, etc), select admin/password for groups of
> > devices, and add them to the database. Once in the database their is a
> > /int pollingFrequency = x; /and /str pollType = y;/ and /str
> > pollTemplate = z;/, where pollType could be "snmp, ssh, agent" and
> > pollTemplate could be "ubnt,cambium-ePmP,mikrotik", etc.
> > josh reynolds :: chief information officer
> > spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com
> > On 12/02/2014 10:15 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> >> My thought is that as we grow, we'll have different types of
> >> equipment out there...  UBNT, MT, Cambium, Mimosa, Netonix, SAF,
> >> Exalt, servers, etc. In my 36 hours of experience, it seems like that
> >> would be the platform to build off of.  *shrugs*
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Mike Hammett
> >> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >> http://www.ics-il.com
> >>
> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><
> https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><
> https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <j...@spitwspots.com>
> >> *To: *"ubnt users" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >> *Sent: *Tuesday, December 2, 2014 1:08:12 PM
> >> *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >> Via Adam?
> >>
> >> Not likely.
> >>
> >> I'm doing some work on making sure the new UBNT MIBs are clean and
> >> standards based. That may not be a required part of the puzzle
> >> though-- snmp is pretty slow. Aircontrol works by authenticating
> >> initially as admin, exchanging ssh keys, and then using the device
> >> itself to poll stats and send them upstream (I believe, it's been
> >> awhile since I've looked into this).
> >>
> >> I know the proper commands to pull the stats we need for graphing and
> >> everything, and we know the ssh commands for upgrading and things
> >> like that.
> >>
> >> Diagnosing the config isn't hard, although the order of the config is
> >> often jumbled from device to device and version to version-- but it's
> >> mostly the same.
> >>
> >> Just need somebody who can create a basic webpage with auth, load up
> >> x devices per page, a basic search function, and some sorts for
> >> organizing CPEs per AP MAC.
> >>
> >> Scheduling would be nice eventually.
> >>
> >> This can't be that hard. I used to do stuff far more complicated than
> >> this, but I haven't done any webdesign/css/php since like '99.
> >> josh reynolds :: chief information officer
> >> spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com
> >> On 12/02/2014 09:55 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> >>
> >>     Think we could get enough stuff into Observium? It already pulls
> >>     OS\package versions. So it knows what's running on it. It
> >>     supports external apps. Maybe we could get a firmware push system
> >>     into it.
> >>
> >>     It has Rancid to pull configurations. Rancid can also push
> >>     commands out to all of the devices. Setup a UBNT config file
> >>     format for the pulling and setup  a method to push configurations
> >>     back out?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     -----
> >>     Mike Hammett
> >>     Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >>     http://www.ics-il.com
> >>
> >>     <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><
> https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><
> https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> >>
> >>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>     *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <j...@spitwspots.com>
> >>     *To: *"ubnt users" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >>     *Sent: *Tuesday, December 2, 2014 12:45:53 PM
> >>     *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >>     looks like we're going to have to come up with a third party
> solution
> >>
> >>     this sucks
> >>
> >>     josh reynolds :: chief information officer
> >>     spitwspots ::www.spitwspots.com
> >>
> >>     On 12/02/2014 09:41 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
> >>
> >>         And that's the problem here... If they want to make a hosted
> >>         thing with integrated billing that nobody seems to want,
> >>         that's fine with me, but it isn't a replacement for airControl.
> >>
> >>         Just make something that the basic functions work on (with
> >>         all devices) that's somewhat reliable and I think most of us
> >>         would be perfectly happy... I don't even care about stuff
> >>         like maps, it just needs to be able to do firmware upgrades,
> >>         make configuration changes and monitor devices. It doesn't
> >>         have to be all that complicated.
> >>
> >>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>         *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> >>         [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett
> >>         [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
> >>         *Sent:* Tuesday, December 02, 2014 12:21 PM
> >>         *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> >>         *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >>         With airCRM, airControl is dead.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>         -----
> >>         Mike Hammett
> >>         Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >>         http://www.ics-il.com
> >>
> >>         <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><
> https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><
> https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> >>
> >>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>         *From: *"Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net>
> >>         *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >>         *Sent: *Tuesday, December 2, 2014 12:20:35 PM
> >>         *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >>         I think I’d be happy if AirControl just supported all the
> >>         hardware they sell and if the AirGateway firmware gets out of
> >>         Beta before the Cubs win the World Series.
> >>
> >>         Rory
> >>
> >>         *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> >>         [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Mathew
> >>         Howard
> >>         *Sent:* Tuesday, December 02, 2014 11:08 AM
> >>         *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> >>         *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >>         true... I don't care if it's there either, but if they for
> >>         some reason think the billing stuff needs to be kept on their
> >>         servers where it's safe from our meddling, I'd be perfectly
> >>         happy if they just cut it all out and let us have the useful
> >>         part.
> >>
> >>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>         *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> >>         [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett
> >>         [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
> >>         *Sent:* Tuesday, December 02, 2014 12:06 PM
> >>         *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> >>         *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >>         As long as they aren't dependent on each other (which I
> >>         believe they already said), they don't have to remove
> >>         billing. Keep it there for all I care, just let me install it
> >>         locally.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>         -----
> >>         Mike Hammett
> >>         Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >>         http://www.ics-il.com
> >>
> >>         <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><
> https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><
> https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> >>
> >>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>         *From: *"Mathew Howard" <mat...@litewire.net>
> >>         *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >>         *Sent: *Tuesday, December 2, 2014 12:03:37 PM
> >>         *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >>         It doesn't seem like it should be all that complicated to
> >>         just remove the billing parts and let us have the rest to run
> >>         on our own servers...
> >>
> >>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>         *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
> >>         [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett
> >>         [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
> >>         *Sent:* Tuesday, December 02, 2014 11:43 AM
> >>         *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
> >>         *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >>         *nods* I'll gladly take airCRM and load it on my existing
> >>         on-net server and just not use the billing aspect.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>         -----
> >>         Mike Hammett
> >>         Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >>         http://www.ics-il.com
> >>
> >>         <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><
> https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><
> https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> >>
> >>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>         *From: *"Kees H" <wi...@calbroadband.com>
> >>         *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >>         *Sent: *Tuesday, December 2, 2014 11:41:26 AM
> >>         *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >>         
> >>
> >>         Don't get me wrong. I would love it if the product works as
> >>         advertised. But as with the unifi software. Allow me to load
> >>         it on my server.  That is all I ask for.
> >>
> >>             ----- Original Message -----
> >>
> >>             *From:*Daniel Peoples <mailto:dpe...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>             *To:*Ubiquiti Users Group <mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >>
> >>             *Sent:*Tuesday, December 02, 2014 9:13 AM
> >>
> >>             *Subject:*Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >>             Sorry, my brain works in mysterious ways(at least that's
> >>             what my wife tells me).
> >>
> >>             What I'm trying to say is let them take a stab at this,
> >>             and objectively judge the final product. They might
> >>             accidentally get it right. At worst, when it comes out of
> >>             beta and doesn't work, don't use it and if enough folks
> >>             do the same, they won't mess with it, it will be
> >>             depreciated and the team that makes it will be re-assigned.
> >>             Also, from the security standpoint I'm just saying that
> >>             it won't be any more insecure than any other solution,
> >>             just because it is a "cloud" based offering.
> >>
> >>             Someone also made a comment that I interrupted as
> >>             "cambium could do it better", to which I was just saying
> >>             YES THEY CAN, because they have the additional financial
> >>             assistance of a upscale ap/cpe combination to support it.
> >>
> >>
> >>             /Daniel Peoples/
> >>             Resonance Broadband
> >>
> >>             /Resonancebroadband.com/ <http://Resonancebroadband.com>
> >>             918-429-3620
> >>
> >>             On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Mike Hammett
> >>             <wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
> >>             <mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
> >>
> >>             You've completely lost me.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>             -----
> >>             Mike Hammett
> >>             Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >>             http://www.ics-il.com
> >>
> >>             <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><
> https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><
> https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> >>
> >>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>             *From: *"Daniel Peoples" <dpe...@gmail.com
> >>             <mailto:dpe...@gmail.com>>
> >>             *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >>             <mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>>
> >>             *Sent: *Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:57:46 AM
> >>
> >>
> >>             *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >>             The revenue of the epmp line doesn't support much.
> >>
> >>             And actually, how much DOES cambium make off those things?
> >>
> >>
> >>             /Daniel Peoples/
> >>             Resonance Broadband
> >>
> >>             /Resonancebroadband.com/ <http://Resonancebroadband.com>
> >>             918-429-3620
> >>
> >>             On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Mike Hammett
> >>             <wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
> >>             <mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
> >>
> >>             ePMP doesn't support what?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>             -----
> >>             Mike Hammett
> >>             Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >>             http://www.ics-il.com
> >>
> >>             <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><
> https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><
> https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> >>
> >>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>             *From: *"Daniel Peoples" <dpe...@gmail.com
> >>             <mailto:dpe...@gmail.com>>
> >>             *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >>             <mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>>
> >>             *Sent: *Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:52:00 AM
> >>
> >>
> >>             *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >>             Yes, but we both know that the epmp doesn't support this,
> >>             the 450 does.
> >>
> >>
> >>             /Daniel Peoples/
> >>             Resonance Broadband
> >>
> >>             /Resonancebroadband.com/ <http://Resonancebroadband.com>
> >>             918-429-3620
> >>
> >>             On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Mike Hammett
> >>             <wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
> >>             <mailto:wispaubntus...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
> >>
> >>             Cambium has CPE at $120 and APs at $500. Completely
> >>             plausible to move over.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>             -----
> >>             Mike Hammett
> >>             Intelligent Computing Solutions
> >>             http://www.ics-il.com
> >>
> >>             <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><
> https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><
> https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> >>
> >>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>             *From: *"Daniel Peoples" <dpe...@gmail.com
> >>             <mailto:dpe...@gmail.com>>
> >>             *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >>             <mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>>
> >>             *Sent: *Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:42:38 AM
> >>             *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
> >>
> >>             Depending on the direction that the tool takes, it could
> >>             be gold or a great big poo stain.
> >>
> >>             If it is a free to use tool like ac1 or ac2, it will have
> >>             that initial spert of awesome that will taper to nothing
> >>             in a year or two. It will eventually be stuck by the
> >>             wayside, as there just isn't enough margin in a $100
> >>             radio to support a tool like this.
> >>             Can Cambium or anyone else like them do this better?
> >>             Sure, but they have ap's that cost 10 times as much, and
> >>             SM's that cost 4 to 5 times as much so they can support
> >>             these tools.
> >>
> >>             If it is a paid(MRC) billing platform, it will more than
> >>             likely mature into something that is MUCH better than ac
> >>             1 or 2 , and something that actually on the billing side
> >>             approaches a real billing software and CPE management
> >>             system.
> >>
> >>             All of this said, I run AC1 for management and swiftfox
> >>             for billing, the two programs both do exactly what I want
> >>             from them, and that is ALL I want them to do. If ubnt
> >>             makes a product that does both functions and is around
> >>             the same price or even higher per cpe, then hoo rah,
> >>             saves me complexity in billing and management.
> >>
> >>             As for the "cloud" side of this, yes it will always have
> >>             more vulnerabilities than my ac1 server that doesn't even
> >>             know where the internet is, but you have to put your
> >>             billing system on the internet so that it can process a
> >>             CC, and don't forget that your azotel or your powercode
> >>             bmu sets IN the data stream. DDOS the box and your entire
> >>             internet connection dies, because they have you to route
> >>             the information through the hardware.
> >>
> >>             BUT at the same time, my new installer doesn't even know
> >>             that ac1 exists passed me showing him stat graphs, and he
> >>             couldn't possibly hope to learn how you tie all of that
> >>             stuff together to make the solid picture that I do when I
> >>             look at all of the stuff together.
> >>
> >>             I honestly don't see what all the nay saying is about. If
> >>             they do it right, it will be a properly good tool, if
> >>             they don't do it right, the adoption numbers will tell
> >>             them that they did wrong.
> >>
> >>
> >>             /Daniel Peoples/
> >>             Resonance Broadband
> >>
> >>             /Resonancebroadband.com/ <http://Resonancebroadband.com>
> >>             918-429-3620
> >>
> >>             On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Justin Wilson
> >>             <li...@mtin.net <mailto:li...@mtin.net>> wrote:
> >>
> >>             Thank you UBNT for treating your customers like they are
> >>             just a bunch of
> >>             hobbyists. There are many of us trying to run a business
> >>             and having the
> >>             proper tools to do that is essential.  For several years
> >>             we have been
> >>             told that Air Control is being active developed, we have
> >>             programmers
> >>             working on it, etc.
> >>
> >>             I have ran a small WISP (1800+ UBNT devices) and if it
> >>             wasn¹t for the few
> >>             piece of AC that worked it would have been a nightmare
> >>             upgrading firmware,
> >>             and checking on the worst performing clients. Sure, we
> >>             could have spent
> >>             countless hours on writing scripts, integrating with 3rd
> >>             party tools, but
> >>             I shouldn¹t have to.  If you give me a tool, make it work
> >>             at one point.  I
> >>             can get that Beta software is, just that, Beta Software.
> >>             Has anyone at
> >>             UBNT actually tried to manage 2000 devices? Upgrading
> >>             firmware, making
> >>             changes, monitoring, etc.
> >>
> >>             It¹s insulting that we spend good money. At one point, we
> >>             were spending
> >>             20-30k a month buying UBNT products.  I realize margins
> >>             are thin,
> >>             marketing, overhead, blah blah blah. But, if my folks
> >>             spent less time
> >>             monkeying with firmware upgrades and the like they could
> >>             put on more
> >>             customers. More customers means more revenue for UBNT.
> >>             Not to mention
> >>             the fact that I am sure there are operators out there who
> >>             would PAY for a
> >>             working AC. Why? Because it saves them labor! Saving
> >>             labor means saving
> >>             money!  That¹s a benefit. There are reasons products like
> >>             Observium and
> >>             Nagios which have paid and free Versions.  I would pay
> >>             money if it meant I
> >>             had less hassle.
> >>
> >>             Cloud based for a network monitoring solution? Really?
> >>             This is such a bad
> >>             idea. How many years will this product be in Alpha or
> >>             Beta?  I installed
> >>             the CMS from Cambium and guess what? It worked? Because
> >>             it worked my
> >>             client is now sold on Cambium.  They see that its an
> >>             integrated solution.
> >>             Market toward the bean counters AND the geeks. Not just
> >>             throw it out there.
> >>
> >>             I know that¹s more than my .02 but dang. You missed the
> >>             boat UBNT.
> >>
> >>             Justin
> >>
> >>
> >>             --
> >>             Justin Wilson <j...@mtin.net <mailto:j...@mtin.net>>
> >>             http://www.mtin.net <http://www.mtin.net/blog>
> >>             Managed Services ­ xISP Solutions ­ Data Centers
> >>             http://www.thebrotherswisp.com
> >>             Podcast about xISP topics
> >>             http://www.midwest-ix.com
> >>             Peering ­ Transit ­ Internet Exchange
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>             _______________________________________________
> >>             Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>             Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >>             http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>             _______________________________________________
> >>             Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>             Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >>             http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>             _______________________________________________
> >>             Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>             Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >>             http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>             _______________________________________________
> >>             Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>             Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >>             http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>             _______________________________________________
> >>             Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>             Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >>             http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>             _______________________________________________
> >>             Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>             Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >>             http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>             _______________________________________________
> >>             Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>             Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> >>             http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>             _______________________________________________
> >>             Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>             Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >>             http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>         _______________________________________________
> >>         Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>         Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >>         http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>         _______________________________________________
> >>         Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>         Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >>         http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>         _______________________________________________
> >>         Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>         Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >>         http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>         _______________________________________________
> >>         Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>         Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >>         http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     _______________________________________________
> >>     Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>     Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >>     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     _______________________________________________
> >>     Ubnt_users mailing list
> >>     Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >>     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ubnt_users mailing list
> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to