Patrick, regardless of the wording, if there is a legal issue then you are 
referring to something potentially illegal, an act which is violating a law 
(regardless of it's legal purpose).
In my opinion this is a purely technical issue, in your opinion network access 
from an applicatoin should require an explicit authorization/action from the 
user. That is not a widely accepted policy, specially when applied to security 
enforcement.

In my understanding there is a general approach on Ubuntu to make the
system as safer as possible by default. I believe this has been
discussed already for the automatic updates, when you do a fresh install
you are not asked if it should check for updates or not, it just does it
and presents you the updates.

Per your requirements, the anti-phishing feature on firefox would be
disabled by default, optionally presenting an option to the user to
enable it or not. I am not sure most users would have a clear
understanding on the answer for such option.  There is a general
consensus that prompting users for options which they don't understand
just makes things worse as they will just accept blindly.

We are talking about a blacklist update connection, not about a feature
which sends private/personal data to a 3rd party without user's
authorization, that would be illegal, at least on my country.

-- 
unauthorized connection to Google
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500601
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to