On Sun, 29 May 2016 10:32:33 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote: >FOSS and GNU/Linux is forged in a quite new and >ground-breaking vision of how copyright should operate. I'm underlining >this because how you let them >> * Having their name on something >could have very counter productive effects on your plan, or make it >plain incompatible with FOSS on a legal level.
Copyright could mean Creative Commons copyright licenses. I didn't reply on Friday, but read the OP's mail and read both, the Debian and Ubuntu policies regarding creative commons requirements, for e.g. sound fonts. The copyright shouldn't be an issue, if just the name should be mentioned, e.g. new-england-conservatory-sound-font. Camouflaged advertising might be an issue or at least ethical aspects could be a problem, I doubt that monsanto-sound-font or nestle-sound-font are wanted, but a new-england-conservatory-sound-font might be ok. However, is there such a sound font already available? Data bases with sounds could be helpful, but there are already several data bases with needed sounds available and nobody has the time to make a sound font from the available sounds. I'm not an Ubuntu (Studio) team member, just interested in sharing help, software, whatsoever ... Has anybody ever made a sound font? If so, what software did you use to make the sound font? Regards, Ralf -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
