On Sun, 29 May 2016 15:15:47 +0300, autumna wrote: >Unlike a nestle soundfont where somebody else would be creating the >soundfont, the New England conservatory would be actually making the >said soundfont.
I mentioned the monsanto-sound-font and nestle-sound-font regarding a discrepancy with the humanist philosophy of Ubuntu. http://www.sigwatch.com/ isn't the measure of all things, anyway, number 2 is Monsanto and number 5 is Nestle. Apart from this chart show, many people most likely consider those two companies to some of the most dangerous criminals on this planet, especial regarding crimes against humanity, ethics. There unlikely is such a discrepancy with the New England conservatory, but at some point any cooperation with for-profit organisations becomes borderline. However, if they should provide a sound-font, unlikely anybody would be against including it to a repository, if it fits to the Debian/Ubuntu Creative Commons requirements and the sound font should provide useful sounds. Hence my question, if somebody from this conservatory already could provide such a sound font. -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
