A "Monsanto sound font" could simply create the sound of someone dying and falling off the toilet from terminal diarrhea with their last words being a reference to corn chips.
On 5/29/2016 at 9:18 AM, "Ralf Mardorf" <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote: > >On Sun, 29 May 2016 15:15:47 +0300, autumna wrote: >>Unlike a nestle soundfont where somebody else would be creating >the >>soundfont, the New England conservatory would be actually making >the >>said soundfont. > >I mentioned the monsanto-sound-font and nestle-sound-font >regarding a >discrepancy with the humanist philosophy of Ubuntu. > >http://www.sigwatch.com/ isn't the measure of all things, anyway, >number >2 is Monsanto and number 5 is Nestle. Apart from this chart show, >many >people most likely consider those two companies to some of the >most dangerous criminals on this planet, especial regarding crimes >against humanity, ethics. > >There unlikely is such a discrepancy with the New England >conservatory, >but at some point any cooperation with for-profit organisations >becomes >borderline. However, if they should provide a sound-font, unlikely >anybody would be against including it to a repository, if it fits >to >the Debian/Ubuntu Creative Commons requirements and the sound font >should provide useful sounds. Hence my question, if somebody from >this >conservatory already could provide such a sound font. > >-- >ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list >ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com >Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel