On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:34:05PM +0200, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote: > I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "voting members" > and "sponsoring" that is being asked for ?
See http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-April/000414.html. > Fwiw, strictly speaking, there is no UFS group anymore as UFS is > in sustaining mode. The source of funding for UFS within Sun is irrelevant; I was referring here to the UFS Community Group that's part of OpenSolaris. This Community Group has a single "leader" (which should really be called "web page editor") and has made no Core Contributor Grants according to poll.opensolaris.org. Therefore the Community Group cannot possibly have voted (using lazy approval, consensus, or any other method) to approve this project proposal. And in fact it's defunct according to the OpenSolaris Constitution. I realise the UFS Community Group is contemplating merger with some other Community Groups. I don't want to get in the way of that, if it's what everyone agrees should happen. But this might be a good time to get together and agree on at least 3 Core Contributors who can make decisions for this Community Group going forward - including the one to dissolve, if that's what you want to do. If you would like your Community Group to be recognised as active again, and able to sponsor projects, please mail the OGB with a lists of the Contributors and Core Contributors once you've worked out amongst yourselves who those should be. > Jan, > > I'm not sure about the link to FMA, what is the intent behind this ? > I'd rather have expected a link and presumably an announcement going > to the MDB project/community instead. Right, please have the project team work this out with the other Community Group(s) they would like sponsorship from. The OGB should not be involved in sorting this out. -- Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!" FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!" _______________________________________________ ufs-discuss mailing list [email protected]
