On Thu, 31 May 2007 20:42:47 +0200, Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:34:05PM +0200, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "voting members"
>> and "sponsoring" that is being asked for ?
>
> See
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-April/000414.html.
>
>> Fwiw, strictly speaking, there is no UFS group anymore as UFS is
>> in sustaining mode.
>
> The source of funding for UFS within Sun is irrelevant; I was
> referring here to the UFS Community Group that's part of OpenSolaris.
> This Community Group has a single "leader" (which should really be
> called "web page editor") and has made no Core Contributor Grants
> according to poll.opensolaris.org.  Therefore the Community Group
> cannot possibly have voted (using lazy approval, consensus, or any
> other method) to approve this project proposal.  And in fact it's
> defunct according to the OpenSolaris Constitution.
>
> I realise the UFS Community Group is contemplating merger with some
> other Community Groups.  I don't want to get in the way of that, if
> it's what everyone agrees should happen.  But this might be a good
> time to get together and agree on at least 3 Core Contributors who can
> make decisions for this Community Group going forward - including the
> one to dissolve, if that's what you want to do.  If you would like
> your Community Group to be recognised as active again, and able to
> sponsor projects, please mail the OGB with a lists of the Contributors
> and Core Contributors once you've worked out amongst yourselves who
> those should be.

Keith, I must admit I'm just baffled.

I do have core contributor status in ON and btw, I am the UFS CRT advocate
so I wonder how this group can not have at least 1 core contributor.

I also do know that Frank Hofmann has core contributor status as well
as probably Sarah as the "owner" of this community.

something seems to go wrong here.

thanks
---
frankB
_______________________________________________
ufs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to