On 3/Sep/19 12:37, Brandon Butterworth wrote: > I'd not bother with ipv4 multicast now, ipv6 refined things > a bit for multicast so v6 ssm is what we'd want to do. Except that STB support is poor. Unless things have changed since the last time I checked (2011). Mark.
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on... Simon Lockhart
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicas... Ray Bellis
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Mul... John Bourke
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Mul... James Bensley
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on... Neil J. McRae
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the... Mark Tinka
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the Int... James Bensley
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the... Neil J. McRae
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on... James Bensley
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicas... Brandon Butterworth
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Mul... Mark Tinka
- Re: [uknof] Current State of... Neil J. McRae
- Re: [uknof] Current State of... Brandon Butterworth
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicas... Neil J. McRae
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the... Brandon Butterworth
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on... James Bensley
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the Int... Mark Tinka
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the... Neil J. McRae
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on... Mark Tinka
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the Internet... David Derrick
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the Int... Neil J. McRae
