> On 3 Sep 2019, at 16:35, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 3/Sep/19 12:37, Brandon Butterworth wrote: >> >> I'd not bother with ipv4 multicast now, ipv6 refined things >> a bit for multicast so v6 ssm is what we'd want to do. > > Except that STB support is poor. Unless things have changed since the > last time I checked (2011). > No nothing has changed V6 support in user space still generally piss poor!
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicas... Ray Bellis
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Mul... John Bourke
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Mul... James Bensley
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on... Neil J. McRae
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the... Mark Tinka
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the Int... James Bensley
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the... Neil J. McRae
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on... James Bensley
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicas... Brandon Butterworth
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Mul... Mark Tinka
- Re: [uknof] Current State of... Neil J. McRae
- Re: [uknof] Current State of... Brandon Butterworth
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicas... Neil J. McRae
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the... Brandon Butterworth
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on... James Bensley
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the Int... Mark Tinka
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the... Neil J. McRae
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on... Mark Tinka
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the Internet... David Derrick
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the Int... Neil J. McRae
- Re: [uknof] Current State of Multicast on the... David Derrick
