cgnat is an expensive mess. It was when it was defined and it has been
ever since. No need to wait to 2026 to know that. Internet global
leadership has been saying that for years.
C
On 15/06/2020 12:29, Paul Mansfield wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 14:58, Denesh Bhabuta :: UKNOF
<[email protected]> wrote:
Play nicely folks.. this is UKNOF, not UKNOT.. just in case anyone had
forgotten. ;-)
On 22 May 2020, at 14:15, Neil J. McRae <[email protected]> wrote:
https://imgflip.com/i/42fn8j
By the way, I wasn't offended in any way by Neil's comment.
But I will revive this thread in 2026 and hopefully a lot more people
will reply "We wished people had listened to you... cgnat has been an
expensive mess and costs us complaints from customers... if only the
big names in the UK internet had explicitly spoken out about IPv6 and
used it as a marketing tool and dragged the others kicking and
screaming to supporting it".
And I will reply with sadness "told you so" :-(
--
Christian de Larrinaga
----------------------
