From: "Peter Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 05/01/2004 05:53, Philippe Verdy wrote: > > > ... > > > >Note that the name I gave just suggests its approximate look. It does not > >necessarily mean its is semantically correct. So of course, if the only use > >of > >this i with lower-right hook has a better traditional name, it should have a > >name that matches this tradition if it is ever encoded. But for now, in > >absence of this character in Unicode, the composition: > > <Latin small letter dotless-i><combining retroflex hook below> > >or > > <Latin capital letter I><combining retroflex hook below> > >is quite good to represent it, and it works with Turkish/Azeri case > >mappings. > > > > > > > Unfortunately in the same old alphabets the Turkish/Azeri case mappings > don't work with the normal I/i as these follow the normal western case > mappings.
Why not then use the Latin ton six for all texts in that period, and allow glyph variants to show the I with right hook glyph used in early Latin Azeri?
