Congratulations, Ray. You are starting to answer questions, about a subject you might even know about. Can you continue, please, though? What you published below doesn't actually provide any information that would support your argument.

Let's take a Penn personnel-wrongdoing charge from recent years. (Pick one that contains no criminal issue, to keep it comparable with the UCD case at hand. In other words, not one of your sex-offender staffer cases.)

You are saying Penn *never conducts internal investigations* of a non-criminal personnel concern; that they are immediately referred to a "third party". Which third party conducts these investigations?

Because I don't believe you. I bet, if a Penn employee like yourself is accused of some non-criminal malfeasance, Penn will mount an internal investigation first. I bet the head of that employee's office or department will be charged with ordering the investigation, if it involves a suspected offense against the proper functioning of that office. And I bet information releases to "the Penn Gazette, the DP, and the Chronicle of Higher Education" will be severely limited pending the outcome of the investigation.

You are a Penn staffer. Can you name a specific example for us, that demonstrates a different investigatory path, now or recently employed by Penn?

-- Tony West


Ray wrote:
first, I believe you may be misreading what some of the concerns are.
it's that ucd is conducting an investigation of itself by itself (rather than by a neutral 3rd party).

second, penn has had several examples in recent years of its own employees, students, administrators and faculty involved in crimes, scandals, wrongdoings. to get an idea of how a non-profit, public-image-is-paramount institution handles situations like these, look at their coverage in penn publications, look at how the situations are handled by third parties, look at how all this is publicly available.


----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to