So people who like to reread 3-year-old neighborhood quarrels can do so
on Purple. That's true, I suppose.
It is hard to imagine why any "organization" would care about these
archives, though. Just because one finds something on the Web doesn't
make it true, and it doesn't get truer the longer it sits around.
Anyway, old rage and old anger aren't that important.
It is Good Friday. Peace to everyone on this list, and all my neighbors.
-- Tony West
On 4/2/2010 9:02 AM, UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote:
when kyle announced his new list on june 28 2007, it was also during a
time when there was a lot of discussion on this list about the
newspaper reports of the ucd scandal over john fenton. here's kyle
discussing it on jun 27:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg18162.html
these discussions were also tied to discussions about the scandal's
negative impact on ucd and its proposed nid, which had been a long
ongoing topic on this list and which kyle actively took part in. over
the years, and even today, many discussions on this list reveal a lot
of things that organizations (like shca, uchs, fopc, ucd) would,
understandably, not like to be publicly available. that's the thing
about this list: it has a publicly accessible archive.
----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named "UnivCity." To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.
