JackOfAll wrote: > KERNEL-WAND-3.0.35-CM36+ > > Terry/Pascal, these 0.55%/0.7% "errors" might still be too large to get > a lock at 88k2 or 176k4. Can you guys try the test files at those freqs > and see if your DAC does lock? > > Changelog... > > Code: -------------------- > > > * Tue Apr 23 2013 - 3.0.35-cm36+ > - Use /27 for spdif 88k2 and /20 for spdif 176k4. > -------------------- > > > > Update... > > Code: -------------------- > > > sudo csos-cleanUpdate-testing kernel-wand-3.0.35-cm36+.fc18 > -------------------- > > > > Sample Rates... > > Code: -------------------- > > > [ 110.299394] spdif_set_sample_rate wanted spdif clock rate = 225792000 > [ 110.305845] spdif_set_sample_rate got spdif clock rate = 227368421 > [ 110.312289] set sample rate to 176400 > > 177k6 0.7% error > > [ 118.264532] spdif_set_sample_rate wanted spdif clock rate = 152409600 > [ 118.270983] spdif_set_sample_rate got spdif clock rate = 151578947 > [ 118.277428] set sample rate to 88200 > > 87k7 0.55% error > -------------------- > >
Thses are the results acording to the M-DAC: '[image: https://imageshack.us/scaled/large/692/samplerateresultsh.jpg]' (http://imageshack.us/photos/my-images/692/samplerateresultsh.jpg/) Note that the error rate for 176k4 is still too high. The M-DAC unlocks a couple of times during playback. The error rate for 88k2 is also quite high compared to the rest but the M-DAC does not unlock. Sure enough, we are at the limits here... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pascal Hibon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7969 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98544 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
