Thanks everyone for your thoughtful replies! I've abandoned the review for the time being.
-- Philip On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Jim Apple <[email protected]> wrote: > WFM. > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Daniel Hecht <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:52 AM, Jim Apple <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> One option would be for us to see how that effort progresses in the > >> 3.x line. If it falters, we could re-evaluate at 4.x branching time. > > > > > > Works for me. > > > >> > >> If we decide to remove it, I would suggest we deprecate it then, in > >> 4.x, and remove it in 5.0. > > > > > > Let's defer deciding on an exact depricate/removal schedule for now. > > >
