Hi Michael, Does the framework just need user account and permission management? or, does it need party/organisation management too?
Perhaps even using an external framework like ldap would be better for managing the organisational structures, user accounts and permissions? Cheers, Chris Michael Xu (xudong) wrote: > hi Chris, > > Thanks. > > For me, I need user, organization, role, permission functionalities from > party management. But I think you are right that maybe we need a more > elegant party management from framework perspective. Or maybe we even don't > need party in the framework. (Just like JIRA did. JIRA implemented its own > user/permission/role) > > -- > Regards, > Michael Xu (xudong) > www.wizitsoft.com | Office: (8610) 6267 0615 ext 806 | Mobile: (86) 135 0135 > 9807 | Fax: (8610) 62670096 > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Christopher Snow < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hi Michael, >> >> The problem with putting in the Party component is that it will throw up >> errors due to dependencies on other components. (Try it and see!) >> >> It is likely that a new component will be required (i.e. developed) for >> a standalone framework that has basic user account management >> functionality. >> >> What party management functionality would you want to see in the >> standalone framework? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Chris >>
