I think that Craig came up with Template Method pattern and that necessitated CoR, if I am not mistaken.
Hopefully CorR, which is old as the hills, is merely a temporary solution to the difficulties caused by the use of the Template Method pattern and hopefully this is just so in the extensible request processor idea. I think that we should be at least skeptical about anyone in direct competition with Struts on the payday front making suggestions about which way Struts ought to go. I think the CoR stuff is really being overblown and probably would be totally unnecessary had a better pattern than Template Method been used out of the gate. Jack <SNIP> On Apr 1, 2005 2:22 PM, NetSQL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank W. Zammetti wrote: > Craig also "came up" with CoR, that is core of future versions of Struts > and outside, etc. > </SNIP> -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
