Hello Ulrich!
AT> Somewhat easier and cleaner, IMO - HTTP support rather then
AT> servlet spec.
UM> Well, the servlet spec is just a Java wrapper around HTTP. So what do
UM> you mean with HTTP support without Servlet API support? You want to
UM> manipulate datagrams on the protocol layer? :)
Okay, maybe I'm wrong :)
Maybe we should just make HttpServlet a ROLE or create a ROLE
similar to HttpServlet.
In fact I was speaking about not supporting ServletContext
since we do have our own Context.
In fact Servlet Spec may be a bit less of IOC then Avalon
and I was speaking about having a Role
public interface AvalonServletInterface
{
String ROLE = AvalonServletInterface.class.getName();
service();
}
but not the ServletContext, etc.
-Anton
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
