On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 09:57, J Aaron Farr wrote: > On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 04:31, Peter Courcoux wrote: > > Turbine 2.3 in cvs has support for avalon components. It is close to > > release ( a week or so, as I understand) and I believe that it is hoped > > that someone will have the time to change the container from ECM to > > Fortress either before or shortly after the release. The next > > development cycle is, I believe, going to focus on converting as many of > > the existing services to avalon components as possible and a redesign of > > the core that should make it more component friendly. > > I had heard this was the case. Wasn't there talk about using Plexus (or > something called Summit)?
There was. I cannot speak for the Turbine developers. However, I think they are concentrating on moving their own framework forward and there has definitely been a fair amount of activity in recent months. Jason did say that he would provide a migration path to Plexus/Summit for turbine users at some point. > > In any case having another web framework (in addition to keel) built > around Avalon would be great. Fortress would have many advantages over > ECM though. I'd love to help, but I'm really swamped at the moment. > Perhaps I'll check out the sources sometime around the upcoming holiday. > > But having integrated Avalon-Struts support would be cool too. :) -- Peter Courcoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
