Thomas fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1339. I've
tested with the trunk and now...
@Repository
@ApplicationScoped
public abstract class LocationRepository extends
AbstractEntityRepository<Location, Long>
{
...
*@CacheResult(cacheName = "cache-name")*
public Location findLocationById(Long id)
{
return findBy(id);
}
....
works as expected.
Since this is related with JCACHE (JSR-107) I was wondering if you can do a
maintenance release (1.8.2)? I'm not sure if other users do JCache in
Repositories.
best regards,
LA
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Should be fixed now by DELTASPIKE-1339.
>
> 2018-04-23 11:31 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <[email protected]>:
>
> > when:
> >
> > //Call the annotated method
> > result = this.proceed(invocation);
> >
> > org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.impl.invocation.ManualInvocationContext.
> > getProceedOriginalReturnValue() <-- the correct value is here, but is
> > not used...
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Luís Alves <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> well...I think the null is cause by the invocation order...since the
> >> cache is executed first I think it gets the return from the other
> >> interceptor which is null....nevertheless this is also a weird behavior,
> >> because I probably can't have the cache annotation mixed with other
> >> annotation, such as logging or other stuff, because the result will not
> be
> >> the expected one.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Luís Alves <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> also with:
> >>>
> >>> @CustomInterceptor
> >>> @CacheResult(cacheName = CacheNames.LOCATION_BY_LOCATION_ID)
> >>> public Location findLocationById(@CacheKey Integer locationId)
> >>>
> >>> my cache never get's populated....on org.jsr107.ri.annotations.Abst
> >>> ractCacheResultInterceptor.cacheResult(CacheContextSource<I>, I) we
> >>> have this chunk of code:
> >>>
> >>> try {
> >>> //Call the annotated method
> >>> result = this.proceed(invocation); //this returns null even if
> >>> find returns a location....so I also suspect that's something wrong
> with
> >>> the delegation...
> >>>
> >>> //Cache non-null result
> >>> if (result != null) {
> >>> cache.put(cacheKey, result);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> return result;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Luís Alves <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> something in the DelegateManualInvocationHandler vs
> >>>> InterceptManualInvocationHandler....
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Luís Alves <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Stack without the @CustomInterceptor:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Stack with the @CustomInterceptor:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can't understand the different behavior :( seem like there's a
> >>>>> previous lookup for @InterceptorBinding annotations...and since none
> was
> >>>>> found it has skipped the method...but the code tells otherwise...any
> idea?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Luís Alves <[email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> so far I think the *method*.getDeclaredAnnotations() when I don't
> >>>>>> have the @CustomInterceptor is the findBy instead of the
> >>>>>> findLocationById...but I can't understand why :(
> >>>>>> that's why no annotation it's on the list, but makes no sense. I'm
> >>>>>> going to try to figure out the behaviour with and without the
> >>>>>> @CustomInterceptor.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
> >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> do you mean that method.getDeclaredAnnotations does not return
> >>>>>>> CacheResult?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2018-04-23 10:09 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <[email protected]>:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> > Good morning,
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > there's still something weird. Only works when I got the
> >>>>>>> @CustomInterceptor
> >>>>>>> > there.
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > @CacheResult(cacheName = "loc-cache")
> >>>>>>> > @CustomInterceptor //only seems to work when I have this
> >>>>>>> annotation
> >>>>>>> > here
> >>>>>>> > public Location findLocationById(@CacheKey Integer locId)
> >>>>>>> > {
> >>>>>>> > //just a wrapper for caching...
> >>>>>>> > return findBy(locId);
> >>>>>>> > }
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > I'm trying to understand from the trace why the @CacheResult is
> >>>>>>> not visible
> >>>>>>> > alone...
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > addInterceptorBindings(beanManager, bindings,
> >>>>>>> > method.getDeclaredAnnotations()); <--should see all the
> >>>>>>> annotation...
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:11 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
> >>>>>>> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > Would be great if you could create a issue + unittest, so i can
> >>>>>>> fix it
> >>>>>>> > next
> >>>>>>> > > week.
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves :
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > I have to leave :( don't do any change until I can confirm
> >>>>>>> everything
> >>>>>>> > ;(
> >>>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > have a nice weekend.
> >>>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Luís Alves <
> >>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > > wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > > well....I think we might have an issue with the proceed
> part:
> >>>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > > try {
> >>>>>>> > > > > //Call the annotated method
> >>>>>>> > > > > result = this.proceed(invocation); <-- this is not
> >>>>>>> calling my
> >>>>>>> > > > > method...I think is because the invocation is
> >>>>>>> > > > org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.
> >>>>>>> > > > > impl.invocation.ManualInvocationContext@69b38203 instead
> of
> >>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>> > method
> >>>>>>> > > :(
> >>>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > > any ideas?
> >>>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Luís Alves <
> >>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > > > wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >> seems to work: org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.im
> >>>>>>> > > > >> pl.invocation.ManualInvocationContext@59fae308
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >> not sure the cache is actually working but I think it's
> not
> >>>>>>> related
> >>>>>>> > > with
> >>>>>>> > > > >> DS. If possible release a version with the fix:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >> @ApplicationScoped
> >>>>>>> > > > >> @Specializes
> >>>>>>> > > > >> public class CustomDeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup
> extends
> >>>>>>> > > > >> InterceptorLookup
> >>>>>>> > > > >> {
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >> @Override
> >>>>>>> > > > >> protected void addInterceptorBindings(BeanManager
> >>>>>>> beanManager,
> >>>>>>> > > > >> ArrayList<Annotation> bindings,
> >>>>>>> > > > >> Annotation[] declaredAnnotations)
> >>>>>>> > > > >> {
> >>>>>>> > > > >> for (Annotation annotation : declaredAnnotations)
> >>>>>>> > > > >> {
> >>>>>>> > > > >> if (bindings.contains(annotation))
> >>>>>>> > > > >> {
> >>>>>>> > > > >> continue;
> >>>>>>> > > > >> }
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >> Class<? extends Annotation> annotationType =
> >>>>>>> > > > >> annotation.annotationType();
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >> * if (**beanManager.isInterceptorBinding(
> >>>>>>> > annotationType))*
> >>>>>>> > > > >> {
> >>>>>>> > > > >> bindings.add(annotation);
> >>>>>>> > > > >> }
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >> if (beanManager.isStereotype(annotationType))
> >>>>>>> *///fun
> >>>>>>> > > part
> >>>>>>> > > > >> is that here is well done ;)*
> >>>>>>> > > > >> {
> >>>>>>> > > > >> for (Annotation subAnnotation :
> >>>>>>> > > > >> annotationType.getDeclaredAnnotations())
> >>>>>>> > > > >> {
> >>>>>>> > > > >> if (bindings.contains(subAnnotation))
> >>>>>>> > > > >> {
> >>>>>>> > > > >> continue;
> >>>>>>> > > > >> }
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >> if (subAnnotation.annotationType(
> >>>>>>> > > > >> ).isAnnotationPresent(InterceptorBinding.class))
> >>>>>>> > > > >> {
> >>>>>>> > > > >> bindings.add(subAnnotation);
> >>>>>>> > > > >> }
> >>>>>>> > > > >> }
> >>>>>>> > > > >> }
> >>>>>>> > > > >> }
> >>>>>>> > > > >> }
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >> Thanks very much Thomas :)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Luís Alves <
> >>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > > > >> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> found this one: org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.im
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> pl.invocation.InterceptorLookup on version 1.8.0
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Luís Alves <
> >>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>> where the hell is DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup?
> >>>>>>> which jar I
> >>>>>>> > > have
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>> to import?!
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Luís Alves <
> >>>>>>> > [email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> I'll try....@Specializes on
> >>>>>>> CustomDeltaSpikeProxyIntercept
> >>>>>>> > orLookup
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> extends DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup should do the
> >>>>>>> trick.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> https://docs.jboss.org/cdi/api
> >>>>>>> /2.0/javax/enterprise/inject/s
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> pi/BeanManager.html#isIntercep
> >>>>>>> torBinding-java.lang.Class-
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Would be great if you can test it, create a issue and
> >>>>>>> provide a
> >>>>>>> > > > patch.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves :
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > I have no idea if it's possible or not. Isn't any
> CDI
> >>>>>>> expert
> >>>>>>> > on
> >>>>>>> > > > the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> mailing
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > list that want to help? ;)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > https://docs.oracle.com/javaee
> >>>>>>> /7/api/javax/enterprise/inject
> >>>>>>> > > /spi/
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > BeforeBeanDiscovery.html#addIn
> >>>>>>> terceptorBinding-javax.enterpr
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> ise.inject.spi
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > .
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > AnnotatedType- doesn't make the annotation visible
> to
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> (annotationType.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > isAnnotationPresent(InterceptorBinding.class))...we
> >>>>>>> need some
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> runtime way
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > to check it...
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > BTW if a solutions is found can you make it
> available
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>> > 1.8.2?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > Yep, they add the interceptorBinding dynamically:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI/b
> >>>>>>> lob/master/cache-annotations-
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > ri/cache-annotations-ri-cdi/sr
> >>>>>>> c/main/java/org/jsr107/ri/
> >>>>>>> > anno
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> tations/cdi/
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > InterceptorExtension.java
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > Just check our code here:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > deltaspike/modules/proxy/api/s
> >>>>>>> rc/main/java/org/apache/
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > deltaspike/proxy/spi/invocation/
> >>>>>>> > DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLo
> >>>>>>> > > ok
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > up.java#L90
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > This code would need ask CDI if this annotation
> is a
> >>>>>>> > > interceptor
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> binding
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > (if possible, not sure if it's in the CDI API).
> >>>>>>> Then your
> >>>>>>> > case
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> should
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > work.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > 2018-04-20 16:25 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <
> >>>>>>> > [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > >:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > This is the reference implementation of the
> >>>>>>> interceptors:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > They have:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
> "
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/
> >>>>>>> > 2001/XMLSchema-instance
> >>>>>>> > > "
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > xsi:schemaLocation="
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd
> ">
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > <interceptors>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > CacheResultInterceptor</class>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > CachePutInterceptor</class>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotatio
> >>>>>>> > > ns.cdi.CacheRemoveEntryInterce
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> ptor</
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > class>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotatio
> >>>>>>> > > ns.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercept
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> or</class>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > </interceptors>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > </beans>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > and they have 2files with:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.
> >>>>>>> InterceptorExtension
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > and
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.
> >>>>>>> CdiAnnotationProviderImpl
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > The interceptors work on a normal cdi bean.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Thomas
> >>>>>>> Andraschko <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > AFAIK there 2 ways of using interceptors with
> >>>>>>> CDI:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > 1) @InterceptorBinding
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > 2) @Interceptors(..)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > We only support 1) currently.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > So i have currently no idea how @CacheResult
> >>>>>>> will work
> >>>>>>> > > even
> >>>>>>> > > > a
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> normal
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > CDI
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > bean. Maybe it's done in Wildfly but not via
> the
> >>>>>>> > "normal"
> >>>>>>> > > > CDI
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> way.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > 2018-04-20 15:48 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <
> >>>>>>> > > > [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> >:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > Submitted: https://github.com/jsr107/
> >>>>>>> > > > jsr107spec/issues/401
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > I suppose they will tell the issue is from
> >>>>>>> DS...:(
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Luís Alves
> <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > I suppose it's CDI capable.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > Red Hat
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > : Pete Muir <--- is on the expert group
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > * @author Gavin King
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > * @author Pete Muir
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > * @author Antoine Sabot-Durand
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > */
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD, FIELD })
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Retention(RUNTIME)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Documented
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @NormalScope
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Inherited
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > public @interface ApplicationScoped {
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > }
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > what I don't understand is how DS look for
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> interceptors? Can
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > you
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > point
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > me out the code?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > Isn't possible to look for all annotations
> >>>>>>> even if
> >>>>>>> > > they
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> don't
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > have
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @InterceptorBinding and then look for the
> >>>>>>> registered
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > interceptors?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Luís
> Alves
> >>>>>>> <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> I suppose it's CDI capable.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Thomas
> >>>>>>> Andraschko
> >>>>>>> > <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> Puh, i wonder why they did it without
> >>>>>>> binding.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> CacheResult is
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > actually
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> exactly a binding for the interceptor.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> Is it CDI compatible? Never had a look
> at
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> > cache
> >>>>>>> > > > API
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> ;)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> Even there is a bridge or something
> >>>>>>> available (
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> https://github.com/tomitribe/jcache-cdi
> ),
> >>>>>>> i'm not
> >>>>>>> > > > sure
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> if this
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > would
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> work
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> with the limited ability to add
> >>>>>>> interceptors to
> >>>>>>> > > > partial
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> beans.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> I think the best solution for now is to
> >>>>>>> create a
> >>>>>>> > own
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> binding.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> 2018-04-20 14:55 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [email protected]>:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > uhm...that's not good :S
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > the annotation is this one:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > https://static.javadoc.io/java
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> x.cache/cache-api/1.0.0/
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > javax/cache/annotation/
> CacheResult.html
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > is there a way that using that
> >>>>>>> annotation we get
> >>>>>>> > > the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > interceptor
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > to
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> work?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > (I can implement the interceptor
> >>>>>>> myself....as I
> >>>>>>> > > said
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I cannot
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > modify
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > annotation as it is javax packge)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:41 PM,
> Thomas
> >>>>>>> > > Andraschko <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > Just to be clear: I have no idea how
> >>>>>>> > internally
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> CacheResult
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > works
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> but our
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > partial beans only supports CDI
> >>>>>>> interceptors
> >>>>>>> > by
> >>>>>>> > > a
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> binding
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > (InterceptorBinding).
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > Everything else, like stated in the
> >>>>>>> doc
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> (@Interceptors,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > @Intercepted,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > @Decorator), is not supported.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > 2018-04-20 14:31 GMT+02:00 Thomas
> >>>>>>> Andraschko <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > In must not work without the
> >>>>>>> > > interceptorbinding.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Do you
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > mean
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > that
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> it
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > does
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > work without?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb
> >>>>>>> Luís
> >>>>>>> > Alves
> >>>>>>> > > :
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> can you update your test to
> remove
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> @InterceptorBinding?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > and
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > check
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> if
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > it
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> works?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> javax.cache.annotation.
> CacheResult
> >>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>> > > > standard
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> so I
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > don't
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > want
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> to
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > extend
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> it to have the
> >>>>>>> @InterceptorBinding.....if
> >>>>>>> > > this
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> is really
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> problem.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM,
> >>>>>>> Luís
> >>>>>>> > Alves <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Retention(RUNTIME)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD })
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > // @InterceptorBinding
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > public @interface
> >>>>>>> CustomInterceptor
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > {
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > }
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > I suspect is this
> >>>>>>> > > @InterceptorBinding....but
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> not 100%
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> sure....what
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > is
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > purpose of that?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:06
> PM,
> >>>>>>> Luís
> >>>>>>> > > Alves <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> don't you want to rewrite your
> >>>>>>> tests
> >>>>>>> > with
> >>>>>>> > > > the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > @CacheResult
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > interceptor
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> ;)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> ? to see if it works?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:57
> >>>>>>> PM, Thomas
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Andraschko <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> No idea, debug if the
> >>>>>>> interceptor is
> >>>>>>> > > really
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> called
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > ;)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 2018-04-20 13:56 GMT+02:00
> >>>>>>> Luís Alves <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > moved the
> @CustomInterceptor
> >>>>>>> > > declaration
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> of the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > interceptor
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> for
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> web app
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > beans.xml and now it gets
> >>>>>>> > called....SO
> >>>>>>> > > it
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> should
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > work
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > for
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > cache
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> as
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > well. Any hint?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at
> >>>>>>> 12:43 PM,
> >>>>>>> > Luís
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Alves <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > So I've created a custom
> >>>>>>> one (in
> >>>>>>> > fact
> >>>>>>> > > > is
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> a
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > "copy"
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > of
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > yours
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > that
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> logs
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> a
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > line):
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Interceptor
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @CustomInterceptor
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public class
> >>>>>>> CustomInterceptorImpl
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> implements
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > Serializable
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > {
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private static final
> >>>>>>> long
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> serialVersionUID =
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 7327752605570037403L;
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Inject
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private Logger
> logger;
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @AroundInvoke
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public Object
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> interceptIt(InvocationContext
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > invocationContext)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> throws
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > Exception
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > {
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > logger.info("yay
> >>>>>>> :)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > CustomInterceptorImpl
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > was
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > called");
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > return
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> invocationContext.proceed();
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > }
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > }
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > registered on the
> >>>>>>> beans.xml (for
> >>>>>>> > > > service
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> and
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > repo
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > layers):
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <?xml version="1.0"
> >>>>>>> > > encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <beans xmlns="
> >>>>>>> > > http://java.sun.com/xml
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> /ns/javaee
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > "
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> xmlns:xsi="
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSche
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> ma-instance"
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jav
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> aee/beans_1_0.xsd
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > ">
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <interceptors>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> ons.cdi.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> CacheResultInterceptor</class>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ...
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> <class>eu.gls.ddtm.config.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > CustomInterceptorImpl</class>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </interceptors>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </beans>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > It's called on the
> service
> >>>>>>> layer
> >>>>>>> > but
> >>>>>>> > > > not
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> on the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> @Repository :(
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ...I'm using Wildfly 10
> >>>>>>> (CDI
> >>>>>>> > 1.x)...
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at
> >>>>>>> 11:50 AM,
> >>>>>>> > > > Thomas
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > Andraschko
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> You can try with a
> custom
> >>>>>>> > > interceptor
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> and check
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > if
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > it's
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > invoked?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I assume you don't use
> >>>>>>> > > > weld-2.0.0.Final
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> or
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> weld-2.0.0.SP1? We
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> have a
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> exclusion for this in
> the
> >>>>>>> unit
> >>>>>>> > test
> >>>>>>> > > as
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> there is
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > something
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > broken,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> as you
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> can check in the link i
> >>>>>>> posted
> >>>>>>> > > before.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> Otherwise, it would be
> >>>>>>> great if
> >>>>>>> > you
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> could
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > provide a
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> unittest
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > for
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > data
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> module.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I don't have time to
> >>>>>>> prepare it by
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> myself.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> 2018-04-20 12:40
> >>>>>>> GMT+02:00 Luís
> >>>>>>> > > Alves
> >>>>>>> > > > <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > So far no
> >>>>>>> success...@CacheResult
> >>>>>>> > > on
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @ApplicationScoped
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @Repository
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > public abstract class
> >>>>>>> > > SomeRepository
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > doesn't seem to work
> :S
> >>>>>>> not sure
> >>>>>>> > > > what
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I'm
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > doing
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > wrong.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018
> at
> >>>>>>> 11:03
> >>>>>>> > AM,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Luís Alves
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > I ditched the
> >>>>>>> > > CustomBaseRepository
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> for
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > now...but
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> still
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > can't
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> get the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > cache
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > interceptor to
> >>>>>>> work...here is
> >>>>>>> > my
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> beans.xml:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <?xml version="1.0"
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <beans xmlns="
> >>>>>>> > > > http://java.sun.com/
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > xml/ns/javaee"
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > xmlns:xsi="
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSche
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> ma-instance"
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > xsi:schemaLocation="http://
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > javaee/beans_1_0.xsd
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > ">
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <interceptors>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> <class>org.jsr107.ri.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > annotations.cdi.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> CacheResultInterceptor</class>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> <class>org.jsr107.ri.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > annotations.cdi.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> >>>>>>> CacheRemoveEntryInterceptor</
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>
> ons.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercep
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> tor</
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CachePutInterceptor</
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> class>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </interceptors>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </beans>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > LA
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018
> >>>>>>> at 10:45
> >>>>>>> > > AM,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Luís
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > Alves
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Thanks Thomas,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> if I understood
> >>>>>>> correctly if
> >>>>>>> > > they
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> are on
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> bean.xml
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > they
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> should
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> works
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> :)...only annotated
> >>>>>>> one don't
> >>>>>>> > > > work.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> I'm now (not sure
> >>>>>>> why I
> >>>>>>> > didn't
> >>>>>>> > > > had
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> it
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > before)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> getting:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> >>>>>>> > org.apache.deltaspike.data.imp
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> l.RepositoryDefinitionException:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Repository creation
> >>>>>>> for class
> >>>>>>> > > > class
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> CustomBaseRepository
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> failed. Is
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> it
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> associated with a
> >>>>>>> valid
> >>>>>>> > > Entity? I
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> got this
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > base
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> class
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > for
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> some
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > repositories
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> for some similar
> >>>>>>> behavior:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> public abstract
> class
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> CustomBaseRepository
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > <E
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> extends
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> DomainObject<K>, K
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends
> Serializable>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > AbstractEntityRepository<E,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > K>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> {
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> not sure if this
> >>>>>>> inheritance
> >>>>>>> > is
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> supposed
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > to
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > work
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> with
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> Repos...
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 20,
> 2018
> >>>>>>> at 10:23
> >>>>>>> > > AM,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Thomas
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > Andraschko
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> >>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> See:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/delt
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> aspike/tree/master/deltaspike/
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>>>>>> > modules/partial-bean/impl/src/
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> test/java/org/apache/deltaspik
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>>>>>> e/test/core/api/partialbean/
> >>>>>>> > > > uc008
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> 2018-04-20 11:22
> >>>>>>> GMT+02:00
> >>>>>>> > > > Thomas
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > Andraschko
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > >:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > Interceptors in
> >>>>>>> generell
> >>>>>>> > > > should
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> be
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > supported
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > but
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> only
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > via
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> custom
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> binding -
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > not via
> >>>>>>> "@Interceptors,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> @Intercepted
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > and
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> @Decorator"
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > 2018-04-20 11:21
> >>>>>>> GMT+02:00
> >>>>>>> > > > Luís
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Alves <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]>:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> So far I found
> >>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> @Repository is
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > actually
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > a
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @PartialBeanBinding
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > and
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> I
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> found:
> >>>>>>> "Currently CDI
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Interceptors
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > applied
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > via
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> @Interceptors,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> @Intercepted
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> and @Decorator
> >>>>>>> are not
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> supported by
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > our
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > proxies!
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> "...does
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> it
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> means
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> that
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> I'm
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> screwed ;)?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> LA
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> On Fri, Apr 20,
> >>>>>>> 2018 at
> >>>>>>> > > 10:11
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> AM, Luís
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > Alves <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > even with
> >>>>>>> > > > @ApplicationScoped
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > interceptor
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> is
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > not
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> working
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > :(
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > can't
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > figure out
> >>>>>>> why...can't
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> @Repository
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > methods
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > be
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> intercepted?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > On Fri, Apr
> >>>>>>> 20, 2018 at
> >>>>>>> > > > 9:53
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> AM,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > Luís
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > Alves
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected]
> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> since it's
> >>>>>>> > proxied...it
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> should be
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > OK...I
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> guess
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > it's
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> like
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > Spring's
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
> repositories.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> On Fri, Apr
> >>>>>>> 20, 2018
> >>>>>>> > at
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> 9:44 AM,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > Luís
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > Alves <
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> Hi,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Repository
> >>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>> > > @Dependent
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > scoped...and
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > seems
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > that
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @Dependent
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> don't run
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> >>>>>>> interceptors, so
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > @CacheResult(cacheName
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > =
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> "my-cache")
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> annotation
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> isn't
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> working :(
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I remember
> >>>>>>> that some
> >>>>>>> > > one
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> proposed
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > that
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > @Repository
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> could/should
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > be
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> >>>>>>> > @ApplicationScoped...if
> >>>>>>> > > > I
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> change
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > them
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > do
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > I
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> have
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > to
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> worry
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> with
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> anything? My
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> EntityManager
> >>>>>>> > producer
> >>>>>>> > > is
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > following:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> @Produces
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> >>>>>>> @RequestScoped
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> public
> >>>>>>> > > EntityManager
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> get()
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> {
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> >>>>>>> return
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> entityManager;
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> }
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I suppose
> >>>>>>> I'll have a
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> different EM
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > for
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > each
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> HTTP
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> request /
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> MDB
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> onMessage() /
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > @Scheduled(cronExpression
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> ="....")...am I
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> correct?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> regards,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> LA
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
